On Sep 19, 2013 12:53 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:51:28 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 13.09.2013 11:48, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:54:49 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/12/2013 10:40 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
I
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:00:43PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Cc'd Dennis to see if this can happen in koji. If it can't I would not be
opposed to the new package unretiring the name and having the pkgdb entry
updated to the new package. The git history would have both the old
package's
A few years ago, there would have been a helpful answer from the admins
who would/wouldn't process such requests. I don't know whether it's
possible
to not only rename a git repo but also the stuff within pkgdb and koji.
Cc'd Dennis to see if this can happen in koji. If it can't I would
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:51:28 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 13.09.2013 11:48, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:54:49 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/12/2013 10:40 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
I just posted a review for avl (the Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic
analysis of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Thu, 19 Sep 2013 13:00:43 -0700
Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com escribió:
On Sep 19, 2013 12:53 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:51:28 +0200, Sandro
We have no ability to rename a package in koji. im not opposed to
reusing the name. Just need some way to ensure its very clear the old
and new are different. Likely need to add a conflicts with the old one.
hopefully versions allow for upgrade okay, if not an epoch will need to
be added.
Dennis
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
We have no ability to rename a package in koji. im not opposed to
reusing the name. Just need some way to ensure its very clear the old
and new are different. Likely need to add a conflicts with the old one.
hopefully
On 09/12/2013 10:40 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
I just posted a review for avl (the Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic
analysis of rigid aircrafts package) [1], and the reviewer noticed that
it conflicts with the retired avl package (the AVL tree manipulation
library). How should one proceed in such
Also, I guess it would be nice to have a package name that gives some
indication of what it is about (unless ofcourse the name itself is well
and widely known )
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/12/2013 10:40 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
I just
On 13.09.2013 09:54, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/12/2013 10:40 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
I just posted a review for avl (the Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic
analysis of rigid aircrafts package) [1], and the reviewer noticed that
it conflicts with the retired avl package (the AVL tree manipulation
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:54:49 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/12/2013 10:40 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
I just posted a review for avl (the Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic
analysis of rigid aircrafts package) [1], and the reviewer noticed that
it conflicts with the retired avl package (the
On 13.09.2013 11:48, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:54:49 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/12/2013 10:40 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
I just posted a review for avl (the Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic
analysis of rigid aircrafts package) [1], and the reviewer noticed that
it
Hi,
I just posted a review for avl (the Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic
analysis of rigid aircrafts package) [1], and the reviewer noticed that
it conflicts with the retired avl package (the AVL tree manipulation
library). How should one proceed in such situations? Does the old
repository
13 matches
Mail list logo