On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:01:17AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 08:34:59AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > This is now merged. The new macros are:
> > %systemd_postun_with_reload, %systemd_user_postun_with_reload,
> >
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 08:34:59AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 06:06:45AM -0400, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 07:15:42AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > %systemd_postun_with_restart, so adding
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 06:06:45AM -0400, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 07:15:42AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > %systemd_postun_with_restart, so adding %systemd_postun_with_reload
> > > or something along those lines doesn't seem like a stretch.
> >
> > →
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 07:15:42AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:45:30AM -0400, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:51:04AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > I think it'd be more effiecient to go with the (slightly ugly, no
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:45:30AM -0400, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:51:04AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > I don't think Fedora would reject those changes, because in general
> > we don't reject things unless they really break stuff for other people.
> >
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:51:04AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I don't think Fedora would reject those changes, because in general
> we don't reject things unless they really break stuff for other people.
> Nevertheless, I agree with what Daniel P. Berrangé wrote in another reply:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 07:36:41AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 08:20:21AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > Now, since this is clearly not a libvirt-specific issue, I believe
> > > this
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 06:45:12AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 02:01:37PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > The problem is that Fedora 39 and RHEL 9.3 are fast approaching and,
> > > if we don't do
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 08:20:21AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Now, since this is clearly not a libvirt-specific issue, I believe
> > this approach should be adopted across Fedora by way of these macros
> > (or
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 02:01:37PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > The problem is that Fedora 39 and RHEL 9.3 are fast approaching and,
> > if we don't do anything about this issue before then, a subset of
> > libvirt users will see
Hi Andrea,
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> since the libvirt-daemon-proxy package is a completely new one as far
> as RPM is concerned, all its systemd units will get presets applied
> during %post. In at least two completely valid deployment scenarios,
> this
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this requires a bit of background, so please bear with me :)
Thanks for all the background... :)
...snip reasonable stuff...
I agree that an upstream systemd solution is what we should strive for.
> The problem is
Hi,
this requires a bit of background, so please bear with me :)
Earlier this year, the libvirt project changed its RPM package to be
more granular[1] as a step towards a future where the legacy
monolithic daemon (libvirtd) is completely gone. This change has
happened upstream, but the Fedora
13 matches
Mail list logo
