Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35

2021-04-01 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Kalev Lember wrote: > I don't think there is anything wrong with having rpath to a private > directory (/usr/lib64/samba) -- that's exactly what rpath is for, so that > the app could find its private libraries that we don't want the whole > world to have access to. What we should avoid is rpath to

Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35

2021-03-31 Thread Honggang LI
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 01:24:02PM -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > usnic-tools honli RPATH had been removed from build usnic-tools-1.1.2.1-8.fc35 . thanks ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an ema

Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35

2021-03-30 Thread James Cassell
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021, at 2:06 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:51:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 26. 03. 21 18:24, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > > >python2.7churchyard cstratak torsava vstinner > > > > I was curious. The error is: > > > >

Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35

2021-03-30 Thread Kalev Lember
h 26, 2021 10:06:28 PM > > Subject: Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35 > > > > > For example, Samba has a number of internal libraries in > > /usr/lib64/samba which have to be linked to by any plugin built for > > Samba, even when it is provide

Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35

2021-03-29 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
- Original Message - > From: "Alexander Bokovoy" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 10:06:28 PM > Subject: Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35 > > On pe, 26 maalis 202

Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35

2021-03-29 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
- Original Message - > From: "Miro Hrončok" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 6:51:56 PM > Subject: Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35 > > On 26. 03. 21 18:24, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > &g

Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35

2021-03-26 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On pe, 26 maalis 2021, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: Hi all. Some time ago there was a discussion from the Fedora Packaging Committee [0] about automatically disallowing the usage of RPATH in Fedora to bring it in-line with the packaging guidelines[1]. Essentially a package MUST remove the RPATH

Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35

2021-03-26 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:51:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 26. 03. 21 18:24, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > >python2.7churchyard cstratak torsava vstinner > > I was curious. The error is: > > 0001: file '/usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-dynload/pyexpat.so' contains a standard > rp

Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35

2021-03-26 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 26. 03. 21 18:24, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: python2.7churchyard cstratak torsava vstinner I was curious. The error is: 0001: file '/usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-dynload/pyexpat.so' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] And the cause is... our own patch 😱 htt

Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35

2021-03-26 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
Hi all. Some time ago there was a discussion from the Fedora Packaging Committee [0] about automatically disallowing the usage of RPATH in Fedora to bring it in-line with the packaging guidelines[1]. Essentially a package MUST remove the RPATH entry from its binaries and/or .so files if it is d