On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 07:28:37 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 4:50 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>
> I do not know the details well enough to be able to decide which is the
> better way here. Both should be doable in principle.
>
>
> As the maintainer of OpenImageIO I
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 4:50 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> I do not know the details well enough to be able to decide which is the
> better way here. Both should be doable in principle.
>
As the maintainer of OpenImageIO I agree with Kevin, I'm OK with either,
but one thing I would ask upstream is
Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> As written on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Philosophy
> updates should aim to fix bugs and not to introduce features. And changing
> ABI is discouraged unless avoided.
Here, we have a library with only 6 packages using it, and the source-level
API appears
Ankur Sinha wrote on 2019/09/14 2:58:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 23:20:50 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Ankur Sinha wrote on 2019/09/13 23:07:
Well, actually some google search result is that the actual fix seems
https://github.com/commontk/DCMTK/commit/40917614e
and the tracker is
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 23:20:50 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Ankur Sinha wrote on 2019/09/13 23:07:
> Well, actually some google search result is that the actual fix seems
> https://github.com/commontk/DCMTK/commit/40917614e
> and the tracker is
> https://support.dcmtk.org/redmine/issues/858
>
>
Ankur Sinha wrote on 2019/09/13 23:07:
Hello,
A CVE[1] in dcmtk was fixed in 3.6.4 which is in F31+. F29 and F30 are
still at 3.6.2 however, and need updating. This includes a soname bump
([2] vs [3]), though, so dependent packages will also need to be rebuilt
and pushed as updates all at once.
Hello,
A CVE[1] in dcmtk was fixed in 3.6.4 which is in F31+. F29 and F30 are
still at 3.6.2 however, and need updating. This includes a soname bump
([2] vs [3]), though, so dependent packages will also need to be rebuilt
and pushed as updates all at once.
sudo dnf repoquery --source
