Re: Provides: libmupdf.so.23.10()(64bit) missing on *EL

Michael J Gruber wrote: > chmod +x'ing should be fine on Fedoras, as well. It used to be mandatory, even, exactly because of the dependency generator requiring it back then. Nowadays, you will get away with both +x or -x. The idea that shared libraries should not be executable comes from

Re: Provides: libmupdf.so.23.10()(64bit) missing on *EL

Am Do., 15. Feb. 2024 um 17:43 Uhr schrieb Kalev Lember : > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 5:30 PM Michael J Gruber > wrote: >> >> Yes. That is: running `/usr/lib/rpm/elfdeps --provides` on F39 against >> the two files libmupdf.so.23.10 rpmdev-extracted from the koji scratch >> builds for fc39 and

Re: Provides: libmupdf.so.23.10()(64bit) missing on *EL

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 5:30 PM Michael J Gruber wrote: > Yes. That is: running `/usr/lib/rpm/elfdeps --provides` on F39 against > the two files libmupdf.so.23.10 rpmdev-extracted from the koji scratch > builds for fc39 and el9 yields > > libmupdf.so.23.10()(64bit) > > in both cases. I could try

Re: Provides: libmupdf.so.23.10()(64bit) missing on *EL

Am Do., 15. Feb. 2024 um 17:22 Uhr schrieb Petr Pisar : > > V Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 05:10:34PM +0100, Michael J Gruber napsal(a): > > Am Do., 15. Feb. 2024 um 17:06 Uhr schrieb Petr Pisar : > > > > > > V Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:57:10PM +0100, Michael J Gruber napsal(a): > > > > Hi there > > > > > >

Re: Provides: libmupdf.so.23.10()(64bit) missing on *EL

V Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 05:10:34PM +0100, Michael J Gruber napsal(a): > Am Do., 15. Feb. 2024 um 17:06 Uhr schrieb Petr Pisar : > > > > V Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:57:10PM +0100, Michael J Gruber napsal(a): > > > Hi there > > > > > > I recently switched mupdf to shared libraries. During test builds

Re: Provides: libmupdf.so.23.10()(64bit) missing on *EL

Am Do., 15. Feb. 2024 um 17:06 Uhr schrieb Petr Pisar : > > V Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:57:10PM +0100, Michael J Gruber napsal(a): > > Hi there > > > > I recently switched mupdf to shared libraries. During test builds on > > COPR for EPEL I noticed a strange difference to fedora builds which I > >

Re: Provides: libmupdf.so.23.10()(64bit) missing on *EL

V Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:57:10PM +0100, Michael J Gruber napsal(a): > Hi there > > I recently switched mupdf to shared libraries. During test builds on > COPR for EPEL I noticed a strange difference to fedora builds which I > can reproduce with koji scratch builds as well (epel9 vs fc39). The >

Provides: libmupdf.so.23.10()(64bit) missing on *EL

Hi there I recently switched mupdf to shared libraries. During test builds on COPR for EPEL I noticed a strange difference to fedora builds which I can reproduce with koji scratch builds as well (epel9 vs fc39). The difference is in the automatic provides for the -libs sub package: Provides: