Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 22:57:27 +0200, Ken Dreyer wrote: On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Norvald Ryeng wrote: If you want us to do more, please say so. We're happy to help out. Thanks for extending the offer. Would you mind commenting on the mysql-workbench issues too? As Remi's pointed o

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Norvald Ryeng wrote: > > If you want us to do more, please say so. We're happy to help out. Thanks for extending the offer. Would you mind commenting on the mysql-workbench issues too? As Remi's pointed out a couple times, there's a long list of crasher bugs that

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

Am 23.08.2013 15:06, schrieb Rich Mattes: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:40 AM, James Hogarth > wrote: > > Frankly I'm still of the opinion the Oracle distribution of the MySQL > based server should be dropped > entirely... If Oracle want 'community-mysql'

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

- james.hoga...@gmail.com wrote: > From the first date Honza announced the intended feature we heard a > lot of promises from Oracle about how they would act with stewardship > but words are cheap - so far in all this time there's been little of > any actual substance. I get the feeling the d

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On 22/08 09.27, Bjorn Munch wrote: > > I will get back with more details later. I have now made new packages available and updated #958131. - Bjorn -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedorapro

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On 23 August 2013 14:06, Rich Mattes wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >> >> >> Frankly I'm still of the opinion the Oracle distribution of the MySQL >> based server should be dropped entirely... If Oracle want 'community-mysql' >> to exist for Fedora and want to ma

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > Frankly I'm still of the opinion the Oracle distribution of the MySQL > based server should be dropped entirely... If Oracle want 'community-mysql' > to exist for Fedora and want to maintain it themselves then they can set up > their own

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 22 August 2013 08:27, Bjorn Munch wrote: > >> >> Yes we are! Sorry for the long silence. The window for F19 closed so >> it became less urgent, then I had vacation, was sick, then others here >> were on vacation but we're all here now and

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On 22 August 2013 08:27, Bjorn Munch wrote: > > Yes we are! Sorry for the long silence. The window for F19 closed so > it became less urgent, then I had vacation, was sick, then others here > were on vacation but we're all here now and I shall be uploading new > packages with MySQL 5.6.13 very so

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Bjorn Munch wrote: > On 21/08 17.26, Ken Dreyer wrote: >> Are the Oracle employees still around? > > Yes we are! Sorry for the long silence. The window for F19 closed so > it became less urgent, then I had vacation, was sick, then others here > were on vacation but

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On 8/21/2013 5:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Ken Dreyer said: I fear a similar fate is going to befall mysql-workbench before too long, since it's been orphaned for a while. Are the Oracle employees still around? I looked a while back, and it is marked "deprecated" in the Fedora

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On 21/08 17.26, Ken Dreyer wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:54 AM, James Hogarth > wrote: > > > When the switch was first proposed it was Oracle who was most vocal against > > it to the point of them stating they'd take over package ownership and > > filing #958131 to update to 5.6 and change

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

Le 22/08/2013 02:01, Chris Adams a écrit : > it still works Really ? See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=ON_QA&component=mysql-workbench&list_id=1639090 Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.o

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On 22 Aug 2013 01:01, "Chris Adams" wrote: > I looked a while back, and it is marked "deprecated" in the Fedora > package database. I'm not sure why it wasn't just orphaned, since AFAIK > it still works, still maintained, and there's no direct replacement. Maybe it was deprecated due to a new m

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

Once upon a time, Ken Dreyer said: > I fear a similar fate is going to befall mysql-workbench before too > long, since it's been orphaned for a while. Are the Oracle employees > still around? I looked a while back, and it is marked "deprecated" in the Fedora package database. I'm not sure why it

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:54 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > When the switch was first proposed it was Oracle who was most vocal against > it to the point of them stating they'd take over package ownership and > filing #958131 to update to 5.6 and change the name from community-mysql to > mysql-commu

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On 21 August 2013 17:11, Honza Horak wrote: > Hi guys, > > there has been some demand for some time to make more strict line between > mariadb and mysql in Fedora. I've tried to summarize some steps we'd like > to apply for F20 in order to decrease that confusing -- see bug #999589 and > feel fre