On 12 January 2013 19:07, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:01:03 +
Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
KDE favourites:
For a spin (or formula) it makes sense that the favourites should
reflect the spin (or formula) focus. The kickstart updates this
through
On 12 January 2013 17:02, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Ian Malone wrote:
KDE favourites:
For a spin (or formula) it makes sense that the favourites should
reflect the spin (or formula) focus. The kickstart updates this
through /etc/skel/.kde/share/config/kickoffrc and
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings.
I've whipped up the early ideas of a way to replace (most) spins with
something that is more generic and useful. I have signed up for a
fudcon session to brainstorm on this idea and see if it can be beaten
into a
Ian Malone wrote:
KDE favourites:
For a spin (or formula) it makes sense that the favourites should
reflect the spin (or formula) focus. The kickstart updates this
through /etc/skel/.kde/share/config/kickoffrc and
/etc/rc.d/init.d/livesys (on the live sytem the installer is a
favourite, so
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:01:03 +
Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course in trying to do that what we were really trying to do was
amend the defaults users would get on the installed system. Some of
this we were able to achieve through /etc/skel files, but that's a
non-scaling and
On 10 January 2013 23:51, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Brendan Jones wrote:
The main problem we have with kickstarts at the moment is that there is
no way (according to current packaging guidelines) to alter files owned
by other packages.
This is just plain impossible anyway
Brendan Jones wrote:
The main problem we have with kickstarts at the moment is that there is
no way (according to current packaging guidelines) to alter files owned
by other packages.
This is just plain impossible anyway (except for config files in /etc), no
matter what you do (i.e. not just
On 01/09/2013 12:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:17:35PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 01/08/2013 08:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, what do folks think? Workable? Crazy? Crazy enough to work?
And we are supposed to QA this how?
Like any software?
I'm not sure
On 01/09/2013 04:34 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 19:18:36 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:17:35PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
On 01/08/2013 08:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, what do folks think? Workable? Crazy? Crazy enough
On 9 January 2013 04:10, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/08/2013 09:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
I've whipped up the early ideas of a way to replace (most) spins with
something that is more generic and useful. I have signed up for a
fudcon session to brainstorm
On 9 January 2013 12:23, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Down-sides, there'd no longer be a live-cd/dvd as a 'demo' system. You
could only try out the formula on an installed system. It looks though
like people are already suggesting overlaying a formula somehow to
create traditional
On 01/09/2013 01:27 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 9 January 2013 12:23, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Down-sides, there'd no longer be a live-cd/dvd as a 'demo' system. You
could only try out the formula on an installed system. It looks though
like people are already suggesting overlaying a
From: Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
Thats not to say perhaps we couldn't think of a clever way to somehow
generate images based on them, but it would probibly take some way to
take an existing machine and make a live image from it. Not sure how
easy that is to do.
I think that's quite
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:15:29PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Setup a infrastructure/framework around a collection of ansible
playbooks to allow our users to simply download a formula for what they
want to do and have a curated setup made for them using Fedora
packages.
I think this is great
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 05:15:02AM +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
no way (according to current packaging guidelines) to alter files owned
by other packages. In the future we might like to choose different
pulseaudio modules to load, ALSA config based on hardware etc. I don't
This is probably not
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 07:36:06AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the question, actually. Can you elaborate?
So you want us in the QA community to go through basically a copy
concept of puppets/chefs and QA any Formula that has been
submitted there?
I didn't say
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:20:58AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
From that response I gather it is something user setup/install after
installing Fedora basically you seem to be then just duplicating and
or trying to come up with a better app installer then already exists
is that the
Le mercredi 09 janvier 2013 à 09:24 -0500, Matthew Miller a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 07:36:06AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the question, actually. Can you elaborate?
So you want us in the QA community to go through basically a copy
concept of
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 09:18:55 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:15:29PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Setup a infrastructure/framework around a collection of ansible
playbooks to allow our users to simply download a formula for what
they want to do
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 08:59:35 -0500
john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
From: Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
Thats not to say perhaps we couldn't think of a clever way to
somehow generate images based on them, but it would probibly take
some way to take an existing machine and make a live image from
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
One of the big questions to answer is distribution. I can see good
arguments on the one hand distributing formulas via RPM and on the
other having an official Git repository for them.
Yep. I am torn here too. rpms get us a lot, but are also
On 01/09/2013 12:26 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
One of the big questions to answer is distribution. I can see good
arguments on the one hand distributing formulas via RPM and on the
other having an official Git repository for them.
Yep. I am torn here
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:50:31 +0100
Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/09/2013 01:27 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 9 January 2013 12:23, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Down-sides, there'd no longer be a live-cd/dvd as a 'demo' system.
You could only try out the
Seth Vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said:
One of the big questions to answer is distribution. I can see good
arguments on the one hand distributing formulas via RPM and on the
other having an official Git repository for them.
Yep. I am torn here too. rpms get us a lot, but are also
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Seth Vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said:
One of the big questions to answer is distribution. I can see good
arguments on the one hand distributing formulas via RPM and on the
other having an official Git repository for them.
Yep. I am torn
On Jan 9, 2013 12:32 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote:
On 01/09/2013 12:26 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
One of the big questions to answer is distribution. I can see good
arguments on the one hand distributing formulas via RPM and on the
From: Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
Greetings.
I've whipped up the early ideas of a way to replace (most) spins with
something that is more generic and useful. I have signed up for a
fudcon session to brainstorm on this idea and see if it can be beaten
into a plan/schedule/feature, or if
On 01/08/2013 08:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, what do folks think? Workable? Crazy? Crazy enough to work?
And we are supposed to QA this how?
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:17:35PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 01/08/2013 08:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, what do folks think? Workable? Crazy? Crazy enough to work?
And we are supposed to QA this how?
Like any software?
I'm not sure I understand the question, actually. Can you
I know that Slax Linux used to have this feature. You could just choose the
modules that you want on the website and download a custom live iso with
those packages! strikeBut that feature is disabled now, perhaps
because/strike they use a new module system now.
Ah, here:
update: definitely works.
It's pretty neat to have a live usb with the exact programs that you like
ready in your pocket!
How can you create an iso on the fly that fast?!
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Mahrud S dinovi...@gmail.com wrote:
I know that Slax Linux used to have this feature. You
On 01/08/2013 09:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
I've whipped up the early ideas of a way to replace (most) spins with
something that is more generic and useful. I have signed up for a
fudcon session to brainstorm on this idea and see if it can be beaten
into a plan/schedule/feature, or if
On 01/09/2013 05:10 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 01/08/2013 09:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
I've whipped up the early ideas of a way to replace (most) spins with
something that is more generic and useful. I have signed up for a
fudcon session to brainstorm on this idea and see if it can
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:18:56 -0800
Mahrud S dinovi...@gmail.com wrote:
I know that Slax Linux used to have this feature. You could just
choose the modules that you want on the website and download a custom
live iso with those packages! strikeBut that feature is disabled
now, perhaps
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 19:18:36 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:17:35PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
On 01/08/2013 08:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, what do folks think? Workable? Crazy? Crazy enough to work?
And we are supposed to QA this
35 matches
Mail list logo
