On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:33 +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 19/04/10 23:51, Slava Zanko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folk,
I want
Slava Zanko wrote:
For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to use. Is good idea to symlink'ing
(shell aliasing) these and much more utilz to another names?
No. It's a quite silly idea.
1. Those tools have been called like that
On 21/04/10 07:00, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Slava Zanko wrote:
For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to use. Is good idea to symlink'ing
(shell aliasing) these and much more utilz to another names?
--snip--
5. IMHO, that kind of
On 19/04/10 23:51, Slava Zanko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folk,
I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to use.
Bookmark this:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Slava Zanko slavaza...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folk,
I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
fsck etc), but for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank Murphy wrote:
Bookmark this: http://ss64.com/bash/
I know about :) This idea just try for standartization of command
names... I know about posix and LSB, but these standards don't make
logic in the names of commands. Okay, as I see, this idea
20.04.2010 03:29, Ryan Rix пишет:
On Mon 19 April 2010 3:51:23 pm Slava Zanko wrote:
Hi folk,
I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to use. Is good
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
20.04.2010 03:29, Ryan Rix пишет:
On Mon 19 April 2010 3:51:23 pm Slava Zanko wrote:
Hi folk,
I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
For example, all present
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Athmane Madjoudj athma...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm against making a mess of PATH with a crapload of symlinks.
If this were to happen, it should happen at a bashrc alias level, and even
then I'm still against it.
i agree, also the proposed commands are too long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
drago01 wrote:
I also against making it global by default. But this can be done
in separate folder, not to standard /usr/bin, and then added for
users who want it just add it into PATH.
Yep, of course. This idea unobtrusive and don't hard for
tis 2010-04-20 klockan 01:51 +0300 skrev Slava Zanko:
For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to use. Is good idea to symlink'ing
(shell aliasing) these and much more utilz to another names?
The present utilities makes sense
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 16:56 +0200, Alexander Boström wrote:
tis 2010-04-20 klockan 01:51 +0300 skrev Slava Zanko:
For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to use. Is good idea to symlink'ing
(shell aliasing) these and much
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/04/10 23:51, Slava Zanko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folk,
I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
For example, all present utilites have sence
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 10:00 +0300, Slava Zanko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank Murphy wrote:
Bookmark this: http://ss64.com/bash/
I know about :) This idea just try for standartization of command
names... I know about posix and LSB, but these standards don't
Thomas Janssen wrote:
Agreed. Plus a command like: filesystem.remove would confuse and scare
novices. Ugh, that removes my filesystem
Well, if it scares them enough not to abuse rm -rf, that's a good thing. ;-)
IMHO file deletions should always be performed through a graphical file
manager
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folk,
I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to use. Is good idea to symlink'ing
(shell aliasing) these and much
On Mon 19 April 2010 3:51:23 pm Slava Zanko wrote:
Hi folk,
I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to use. Is good idea to symlink'ing
(shell aliasing)
I'm against making a mess of PATH with a crapload of symlinks.
If this were to happen, it should happen at a bashrc alias level, and even
then I'm still against it.
i agree, also the proposed commands are too long to be typed in the terminal.
they look like name-spaces in a programming
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 01:51 +0300, Slava Zanko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folk,
I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to
i agree, also the proposed commands are too long to be typed in the terminal.
they look like name-spaces in a programming language
Best regards
Maybe PASH is what you are searching: http://pash.sourceforge.net/
--
Athmane Madjoudj
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 01:51 +0300, Slava Zanko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folk,
I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to
Hi,
2010/4/20 Slava Zanko slavaza...@gmail.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folk,
I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to use. Is
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 02:06 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
2010/4/20 Slava Zanko slavaza...@gmail.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folk,
I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
For example, all present utilites have sence
2010/4/20 Bernd Stramm bernd.str...@gmail.com:
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 02:06 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
2010/4/20 Slava Zanko slavaza...@gmail.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folk,
I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
24 matches
Mail list logo