Should gpg use alternatives?

2010-11-07 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Should gpg 1.x be installed as /usr/bin/gpg1, gpg 2.x be installed as /usr/bin/gpg2 (as is already the case), and /usr/bin/gpg replaced with a symlink managed by alternatives? pgpiqSHAQTCkm.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Should gpg use alternatives?

2010-11-07 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:20:02PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Should gpg 1.x be installed as /usr/bin/gpg1, gpg 2.x be installed as /usr/bin/gpg2 (as is already the case), and /usr/bin/gpg replaced with a symlink managed by alternatives? If you check the list archives, this has come up