> To build a module, you need kernel-devel, and it needs to be the same version
> as the
> kernel you are building against. kernel-devel can be parallel installed, so
> you can have
> multiple versions. It is highly recommended that you run the 5.3.11 or newer
> kernel
> packages at this point
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 6:20 PM Steven Munroe wrote:
>
> > kernel-headers is related to the userspace API and is not tied to a
> > particular kernel version.
> > If the userspace API doesn't change there's no need to rebuild. Is there a
> > problem you're
> > seeing by not having an updated
> kernel-headers is related to the userspace API and is not tied to a
> particular kernel version.
> If the userspace API doesn't change there's no need to rebuild. Is there a
> problem you're
> seeing by not having an updated kernel-headers?
That does not be it works in all cases.
I have
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, at 3:46 PM, James Cassell wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, at 2:50 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > On 11/7/19 1:31 PM, James Cassell wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, at 1:23 PM, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
> > >> I am on kernel 5.3.8 but I still have
> > >>
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, at 2:50 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 11/7/19 1:31 PM, James Cassell wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, at 1:23 PM, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
> >> I am on kernel 5.3.8 but I still have
> >> kernel-headers-5.3.6-200.fc30.x86_64, which hasn't updated.
> >>
> >> Is there a reason
On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:31:23 -0500
"James Cassell" wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, at 1:23 PM, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
> > I am on kernel 5.3.8 but I still have
> > kernel-headers-5.3.6-200.fc30.x86_64, which hasn't updated.
> >
> > Is there a reason a new kernel-headers package hasn't been
> >
On 11/7/19 1:31 PM, James Cassell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, at 1:23 PM, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
I am on kernel 5.3.8 but I still have
kernel-headers-5.3.6-200.fc30.x86_64, which hasn't updated.
Is there a reason a new kernel-headers package hasn't been generated for
the newer versions? Has
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, at 1:23 PM, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
> I am on kernel 5.3.8 but I still have
> kernel-headers-5.3.6-200.fc30.x86_64, which hasn't updated.
>
> Is there a reason a new kernel-headers package hasn't been generated for
> the newer versions? Has it be superseded by another
I am on kernel 5.3.8 but I still have
kernel-headers-5.3.6-200.fc30.x86_64, which hasn't updated.
Is there a reason a new kernel-headers package hasn't been generated for
the newer versions? Has it be superseded by another package? If so,
then dependencies on glibc-headers need to be fixed.
