Re: Suggests/Recommends proposal [Was: Re: PackageKit in Fedora 15 (beta)]

2011-04-27 Thread tim.laurid...@gmail.com
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: Dne 26.4.2011 18:23, Florian Festi napsal(a): I think if anybody can come up with a exact description how they should look like and how they should work and can create some evidence that this is want we need and want

Re: Suggests/Recommends proposal [Was: Re: PackageKit in Fedora 15 (beta)]

2011-04-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: The hard part is to define what the package tools should do in the different cases A depsolver need to work with real requirements, so it need to be defined in what cases that a soft requirement will become a real requirements to do the right thing See my

Re: Suggests/Recommends proposal [Was: Re: PackageKit in Fedora 15 (beta)]

2011-04-27 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:47, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: The hard part is to define what the package tools should do in the different cases A depsolver need to work with real requirements, so it need to be defined in what cases that a soft

Suggests/Recommends proposal [Was: Re: PackageKit in Fedora 15 (beta)]

2011-04-26 Thread Matej Cepl
Dne 26.4.2011 18:23, Florian Festi napsal(a): I think if anybody can come up with a exact description how they should look like and how they should work and can create some evidence that this is want we need and want implementing them is not the problem[*]. Until now no one has come up with a