Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2020-12-30 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Hi all, Neal and I are looking at getting ButterManager packaged, and it depends on sip and PyQt5-sip: https://github.com/egara/buttermanager/blob/master/requirements.txt Now, this is where things get a bit odd: - the current sip (4.19.24) does not have autogenerated Python provides, but sip5 d

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2020-12-30 Thread Scott Talbert
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: Hi all, Neal and I are looking at getting ButterManager packaged, and it depends on sip and PyQt5-sip: https://github.com/egara/buttermanager/blob/master/requirements.txt Now, this is where things get a bit odd: - the current sip (4.19.24) d

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2020-12-30 Thread Scott Talbert
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Scott Talbert wrote: Neal and I are looking at getting ButterManager packaged, and it depends on sip and PyQt5-sip: https://github.com/egara/buttermanager/blob/master/requirements.txt Now, this is where things get a bit odd: - the current sip (4.19.24) does not have autog

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2020-12-31 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 08:26:42PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > > I think fundamentally the version of PyQt5-sip probably needs to match (or > be very close to) the version of sip that PyQt5 itself was compiled with. I think for calibre (which is currently failing with): ... /usr/bin/python3 -

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2020-12-31 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 20:40 -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Scott Talbert wrote: > > > > Neal and I are looking at getting ButterManager packaged, and it > > > depends on sip and PyQt5-sip: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/egara/buttermanager/blob/master/requirements.txt

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2020-12-31 Thread Scott Talbert
On Thu, 31 Dec 2020, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I think fundamentally the version of PyQt5-sip probably needs to match (or be very close to) the version of sip that PyQt5 itself was compiled with. I think for calibre (which is currently failing with): ... /usr/bin/python3 -c import os; os.chdir('/bu

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2021-01-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 10:02:44PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Thu, 31 Dec 2020, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > I think fundamentally the version of PyQt5-sip probably needs to match (or > > > be very close to) the version of sip that PyQt5 itself was compiled with. > > > > I think for calibre (

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2021-01-02 Thread Scott Talbert
On Sat, 2 Jan 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I think fundamentally the version of PyQt5-sip probably needs to match (or be very close to) the version of sip that PyQt5 itself was compiled with. I think for calibre (which is currently failing with): ... /usr/bin/python3 -c import os; os.chdir('/bui

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2021-01-04 Thread Rex Dieter
Scott Talbert wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jan 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I think fundamentally the version of PyQt5-sip probably needs to match > (or be very close to) the version of sip that PyQt5 itself was > compiled with. I think for calibre (which is currently failing with): >

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2021-01-06 Thread Scott Talbert
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, Rex Dieter wrote: I think fundamentally the version of PyQt5-sip probably needs to match (or be very close to) the version of sip that PyQt5 itself was compiled with. I think for calibre (which is currently failing with): ... /usr/bin/python3 -c import os; os.chdir('/build

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2021-01-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:07:24AM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > > OK. > > And of course, now sip6 has been released. So perhaps we should just skip > sip5 altogether and just go directly to 6. Ha. Figures. I just want to get back to where I can update calibre again. It updates very often be

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2021-04-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:42:28PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > > OK, I'm going to make an attempt to move python-qt5 (and its friends) to > sip5. I'm planning to build everything in a copr first. Hey Scott. Did you get any further with this? Anything I can do to help? I'd really like to be

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2021-04-26 Thread Scott Talbert
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:42:28PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: OK, I'm going to make an attempt to move python-qt5 (and its friends) to sip5. I'm planning to build everything in a copr first. Hey Scott. Did you get any further with this? Anything I

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2021-04-26 Thread Rex Dieter
Scott Talbert wrote: > Yes, I got fairly far with porting all PyQt5 SIP consumers (including > calibre) to use SIPv5. I think I then got discouraged at the thought of > making a bunch of PRs and having to nag maintainers to merge them in some > sort of coordinated fashion. > > I guess - if I get

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2021-04-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:29:52PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Sat, 24 Apr 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:42:28PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > > > > > > OK, I'm going to make an attempt to move python-qt5 (and its friends) to > > > sip5. I'm planning to build eve

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2021-04-27 Thread Scott Talbert
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I'd be able and willing to assist here too, thanks for working on it! As far as sip6 goes, I'd venture the adjustment from v5 to v6 will be smaller than what v4 to v5 was. Yeah, agreed. Happy to work with you both and get this done. :) Okay, I'll wor

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

2021-01-12 Thread Scott Talbert
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, Rex Dieter wrote: I think fundamentally the version of PyQt5-sip probably needs to match (or be very close to) the version of sip that PyQt5 itself was compiled with. I think for calibre (which is currently failing with): ... /usr/bin/python3 -c import os; os.chdir('/build