Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-11-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 30.10.2015 v 18:06 Will Woods napsal(a): > On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 15:00 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 29.10.2015 v 13:24 Honza Šilhan napsal(a): >>> You can exclude the conflicting packages to proceed the system >>> -upgrade i.e.: >>> "dnf system-

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-11-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.10.2015 um 10:09 schrieb Christopher Meng: >> >> You have a chance to get your rpmfusion softwares wiped after the sync. >> >> [1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677 > > > unacceptable > >

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-30 Thread Honza Šilhan
> From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondr...@redhat.com> > > Dne 29.10.2015 v 13:24 Honza Šilhan napsal(a): > > You can exclude the conflicting packages to proceed the system-upgrade > > i.e.: > > "dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync -x &g

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-30 Thread Kamil Paral
> > From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondr...@redhat.com> > > > > Dne 29.10.2015 v 13:24 Honza Šilhan napsal(a): > > > You can exclude the conflicting packages to proceed the system-upgrade > > > i.e.: > > > "dnf system-upgrade download --rel

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-30 Thread Will Woods
On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 14:20 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > just behave like "yum --releasever=XX distro-sync" all the years > before > and just REFUSE to upgrade if there are conflicts This is, in fact, the default behavior in dnf system-upgrade 0.5.x and higher. -w -- devel

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-30 Thread Will Woods
On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 15:00 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 29.10.2015 v 13:24 Honza Šilhan napsal(a): > > You can exclude the conflicting packages to proceed the system > > -upgrade i.e.: > > "dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync -x > >

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Honza Šilhan
> From: "Miroslav Suchý" <msu...@redhat.com> > > >> # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync --best > >> --allowerasing > >> Error: package rubygem-celluloid-0.15.2-2.fc22.noarch requires > >> rubygem(timers) < 1.2,

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.10.2015 um 13:24 schrieb Honza Šilhan: From: "Miroslav Suchý" From: "Reindl Harald" the software upgrade just have to mention the conflicting packages and stop until somebody enables a --force switch and in general DNF has to be much more

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Qui, 2015-10-29 at 17:09 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > You have a chance to get your rpmfusion softwares wiped after the sync. > > [1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677 yep, so not distro-sync -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapr

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 29.10.2015 v 13:24 Honza Šilhan napsal(a): > You can exclude the conflicting packages to proceed the system-upgrade i.e.: > "dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync -x > rubygem-celluloid --allowerasing" Does the "-x" work actually? Las

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 01:33:45PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 29.10.2015 um 13:24 schrieb Honza Šilhan: > >>From: "Miroslav Suchý" > >>From: "Reindl Harald" > >>the software upgrade just have to mention the conflicting packages and > >>stop

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Reindl Harald
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677 yep, so not distro-sync nonsense when i read the bugreport * system-upgrade now uses dnf (standard "dnf update" approach) THAT is the problem and i really wonder what somebody thinks by implement it that way after *many years* of "y

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Sérgio Basto
;> [1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677 > > > > yep, so not distro-sync > > nonsense when i read the bugreport > > * system-upgrade now uses dnf (standard "dnf update" approach) > > THAT is the problem and i really wonder what somebod

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Reindl Harald
the sync. [1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677 yep, so not distro-sync nonsense when i read the bugreport * system-upgrade now uses dnf (standard "dnf update" approach) THAT is the problem and i really wonder what somebody thinks by implement it that way after *

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.10.2015 um 13:37 schrieb Sérgio Basto: On Qui, 2015-10-29 at 17:09 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: You have a chance to get your rpmfusion softwares wiped after the sync. [1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677 yep, so not distro-sync nonsense when i read

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>>[1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677 > > > >yep, so not distro-sync > > nonsense when i read the bugreport > > * system-upgrade now uses dnf (standard "dnf update" approach) > > THAT is the problem and i really wonder what som

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 10/29/2015 05:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: the software upgrade just have to mention the conflicting packages and stop until somebody enables a --force switch and in general DNF has to be much more verbose in case of dependency problems instead just saying "can't do anything because broken

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 10/29/2015 08:33 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 29.10.2015 um 13:24 schrieb Honza Šilhan: dnf has `--allowerasing switch - it will resolve the conflicts by uninstallation of conflicting packages. Installing the packages regardless the dependencies by `--force` is really dangerous and will

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
to: > >>>On Qui, 2015-10-29 at 17:09 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > >>>>You have a chance to get your rpmfusion softwares wiped after the sync. > >>>> > >>>>[1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677 > >>> > >&

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.10.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Przemek Klosowski: On 10/29/2015 08:33 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 29.10.2015 um 13:24 schrieb Honza Šilhan: dnf has `--allowerasing switch - it will resolve the conflicts by uninstallation of conflicting packages. Installing the packages regardless the

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2015-10-29, Reindl Harald wrote: > removing random packages is also really dangerous and *not* acceptable > It does not remove random packages. It removes packages that are not needed because the package was not installed explicitly and it's not a transitive dependency

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 29 October 2015 at 15:00, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 29.10.2015 v 13:24 Honza Šilhan napsal(a): > > You can exclude the conflicting packages to proceed the system-upgrade i.e.: > > "dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync -x > > rubyge

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Kevin Kofler
Petr Pisar wrote: > It does not remove random packages. It removes packages that are not > needed because the package was not installed explicitly and it's not > a transitive dependency of such explicitly installed package. That's the autoremove misfeature, which is really a different issue than

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 26.10.2015 v 18:39 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > --distro-sync is now (in git, I don't think this version was released yet) > the default in dnf-plugin-system-upgrade. OK. So I will file BZs for all issues I find with --distro-sync I hit. >> # dnf system-upgr

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Christopher Meng
You have a chance to get your rpmfusion softwares wiped after the sync. [1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677 -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.10.2015 um 10:09 schrieb Christopher Meng: You have a chance to get your rpmfusion softwares wiped after the sync. [1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677 unacceptable the software upgrade just have to mention the conflicting packages and stop until somebody

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-26 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 06:24:43PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I am trying to upgrade to F23 (I know still not finished but...) > > In past I always done 'distro-sync'. Albeit with yum. > > Now I tried: > dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync >

To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

2015-10-26 Thread Miroslav Suchý
I am trying to upgrade to F23 (I know still not finished but...) In past I always done 'distro-sync'. Albeit with yum. Now I tried: dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync --best dnf system-upgrade download