On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 13:21, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 17:28, clime wrote:
>>
>> > > and lines like this:
>> > > https://pagure.io/Fedora-Infra/rpmautospec/blob/3c208f17329940977cbe1552f3d1bbee35014f93/f/rpmautospec/tag_package.py#_53
>> > > are not needed?
>> >
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 17:28, clime wrote:
> > > and lines like this:
> > >
> https://pagure.io/Fedora-Infra/rpmautospec/blob/3c208f17329940977cbe1552f3d1bbee35014f93/f/rpmautospec/tag_package.py#_53
> > > are not needed?
> >
> > This is not involved in the computation of the next release value.
Michael Cronenworth writes:
> On 4/15/20 5:52 PM, Dan Čermák wrote:
>> That is pretty useful, because as a maintainer you can just update a
>> library and you don't have to do a thing to get dependent packages
>> rebuilt. So no more "unannounced SONAME bump", "please rebuild XYZ" and
>> "need a
> > and lines like this:
> > https://pagure.io/Fedora-Infra/rpmautospec/blob/3c208f17329940977cbe1552f3d1bbee35014f93/f/rpmautospec/tag_package.py#_53
> > are not needed?
>
> This is not involved in the computation of the next release value.
> So, do we use the build history of the package to
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 03:07:37PM +0200, clime wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 14:12, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:16:16PM +0200, clime wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 09:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 01:57:40AM
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 14:12, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:16:16PM +0200, clime wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 09:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 01:57:40AM +0200, clime wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 00:52, Dan Čermák
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 14:12, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:16:16PM +0200, clime wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 09:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 01:57:40AM +0200, clime wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 00:52, Dan Čermák
On 4/15/20 5:52 PM, Dan Čermák wrote:
That is pretty useful, because as a maintainer you can just update a
library and you don't have to do a thing to get dependent packages
rebuilt. So no more "unannounced SONAME bump", "please rebuild XYZ" and
"need a provenpackager to rebuild dependent
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:16:16PM +0200, clime wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 09:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 01:57:40AM +0200, clime wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 00:52, Dan Čermák
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > clime writes:
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 13
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 09:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 01:57:40AM +0200, clime wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 00:52, Dan Čermák
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > clime writes:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 10:55, Dan Čermák
> > > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 01:57:40AM +0200, clime wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 00:52, Dan Čermák
> wrote:
> >
> > clime writes:
> >
> > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 10:55, Dan Čermák
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi list,
> > >>
> > >> my question is pretty much $subject: Why doesn't Koschei kick
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 00:52, Dan Čermák wrote:
>
> clime writes:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 10:55, Dan Čermák
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi list,
> >>
> >> my question is pretty much $subject: Why doesn't Koschei kick of
> >> real builds off packages on dependency changes? From my naive POV that
clime writes:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 10:55, Dan Čermák
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> my question is pretty much $subject: Why doesn't Koschei kick of
>> real builds off packages on dependency changes? From my naive POV that
>> looks like the missing piece to give us the "OBS-experience".
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 10:55, Dan Čermák wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> my question is pretty much $subject: Why doesn't Koschei kick of
> real builds off packages on dependency changes? From my naive POV that
> looks like the missing piece to give us the "OBS-experience". Having
> that at least in
Fabio Valentini writes:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:55 AM Dan Čermák
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> my question is pretty much $subject: Why doesn't Koschei kick of
>> real builds off packages on dependency changes? From my naive POV that
>> looks like the missing piece to give us the
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 19:23, clime wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 14:48, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 5:15 AM Fabio Valentini
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:55 AM Dan Čermák
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi list,
> > > >
> > > > my question is pretty
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 14:48, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 5:15 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:55 AM Dan Čermák
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi list,
> > >
> > > my question is pretty much $subject: Why doesn't Koschei kick of
> > > real builds off
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 5:15 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:55 AM Dan Čermák
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > my question is pretty much $subject: Why doesn't Koschei kick of
> > real builds off packages on dependency changes? From my naive POV that
> > looks like the
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:55 AM Dan Čermák
wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> my question is pretty much $subject: Why doesn't Koschei kick of
> real builds off packages on dependency changes? From my naive POV that
> looks like the missing piece to give us the "OBS-experience". Having
> that at least in
Hi list,
my question is pretty much $subject: Why doesn't Koschei kick of
real builds off packages on dependency changes? From my naive POV that
looks like the missing piece to give us the "OBS-experience". Having
that at least in Rawhide sounds like a good thing to me.
Cheers,
Dan
20 matches
Mail list logo