Il giorno mar, 09/02/2021 alle 18.21 +, Ian McInerney ha scritto:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:58 PM Germano Massullo <
> germano.massu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can anybody please help updating Audacity package? I cannot help
> > this
> > time. Despite
McInerney
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:58 PM Germano Massullo
> wrote:
>
> > Can anybody please help updating Audacity package? I cannot help this
> > time. Despite this package has 2 maintainers, the software is no
> > up-to-date and is highly unstable and
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:58 PM Germano Massullo
wrote:
> Can anybody please help updating Audacity package? I cannot help this
> time. Despite this package has 2 maintainers, the software is no
> up-to-date and is highly unstable and crashes every time you use it
> https://bugzill
Il 09/02/21 19:06, Gwyn Ciesla via devel ha scritto:
> I'll take care of it.
Thank you!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
wrote:
> Can anybody please help updating Audacity package? I cannot help this
> time. Despite this package has 2 maintainers, the software is no
> up-to-date and is highly unstable and crashes every time you use it
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836497
>
>
Can anybody please help updating Audacity package? I cannot help this
time. Despite this package has 2 maintainers, the software is no
up-to-date and is highly unstable and crashes every time you use it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836497
CubicSDR (Ham Radio panadapter spectrum visualizer using inexpensive
receivers) upstream moved to wxWidgets 3.1 over 18 months ago. While I had
some success in backing out some specific changes that let it compile with
wxGTK 3.0, upstream has moved on considerably since then, making extensive
use
use renowned applications such as Audacity in
stable releases of Fedora for that purpose?
Feel free to ship wxGTK 3.1 and an Audacity built against it in a Copr, for
people deliberately opting in to testing such a build. But please do not
force it onto users of stable releases, who have not opted in
On 12/11/19 8:46 am, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Scott Talbert wrote:
Ouch. So now you're talking about wanting to package a *fork* of a
development release of wxGTK.
No. (unless it was done by simply turning on a config item). Looking
closer, building audacity requires
David Timms wrote:
> Perhaps calling a compat package 3.2.0.develseries.3.1.3 etc would make
> sense to indicate to consumers that they are using what will soon (TM)
> become the main version.
Please no. There is a numeric version, please use that, not some ugly
version hack.
What would be
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Scott Talbert wrote:
Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1.
Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository.
see: https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux
or from the horse - (Mr Ed):
https://github.com/audacity
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019, David Timms wrote:
David Timms wrote:
Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1.
Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository.
see: https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux
or from the horse - (Mr Ed):
https
David Timms wrote:
> see: https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux
> or from the horse - (Mr Ed):
> https://github.com/audacity/audacity/blob/master/linux/build.txt
> "
> wxWidgets:
>
> 1) Clone wxWidgets and checkout 3.1.1 from the Audacity fork of th
On 12/11/19 8:05 am, David Timms wrote:
Audacity support when my users crash because they aren't running the
recommended library (there is other locally adjusted libs which Audacity
uses). Not that this is different from the past - but I would like it to
oops, dropped word
On 12/11/19 1:33 am, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019, 15:09 VÃt Ondruch <mailto:vondr...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Dne 11. 11. 19 v 14:39 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> David Timms wrote:
>> I would like to be able to release the next Audacity (onc
On 12/11/19 1:51 am, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, David Timms wrote:
Issue:
Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1.
The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel.
wxGTK3.1 is a development series which eventually leads to wxGTK3.2
red, *why* is it required?
Because it fixes many issues with the earlier version.
On Archlinux audacity-git [1] builds against the default repo version of
wxGTK, i.e. 3.0.4, so it does not seem to be required.
It can in fact build against it - but then shows all the bugs that
building against the old wxGT
On 12/11/19 12:39 am, Kevin Kofler wrote:
David Timms wrote:
Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1.
Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository.
see: https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux
or from the horse - (Mr Ed):
https
On 11/11/2019 3:51 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
> Hi, one of the wxGTK maintainers here. Where is the requirement to use
> wxGTK 3.1 documented? Like Kevin, I can't find that documented. And if
> it is definitely required, *why* is it required?
On Archlinux audacity-git [1] build
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, David Timms wrote:
Issue:
Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1.
The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel.
wxGTK3.1 is a development series which eventually leads to wxGTK3.2 release.
Upstream is currently at 3.1.3
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019, 15:09 Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 11. 11. 19 v 14:39 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> > David Timms wrote:
> >> Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1.
> > Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository.
Dne 11. 11. 19 v 14:39 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> David Timms wrote:
>> Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1.
> Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository.
>
>> The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/
David Timms wrote:
> Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1.
Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository.
> The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel.
> wxGTK3.1 is a development series which eventua
Issue:
Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1.
The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel.
wxGTK3.1 is a development series which eventually leads to wxGTK3.2 release.
Upstream is currently at 3.1.3 and expecting at least a 3.1.4 next year
Since nobody replied in ~24h, I went ahead and pushed the green button ;)
It's building now.
Zbyszek
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 09:07:18AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, Vascom wrote:
>
> >I am think for rawhide wxGTK3-devel can be simply removed from spec (not
> >need
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, Vascom wrote:
I am think for rawhide wxGTK3-devel can be simply removed from spec (not
need %if...).Because for old releases it has separate branches.
Yes, that's fine too. It appears, however, that the spec was being
maintained for epel and older fedoras, so I made the
I am think for rawhide wxGTK3-devel can be simply removed from spec (not
need %if...).
Because for old releases it has separate branches.
ср, 18 окт. 2017 г. в 3:31, Scott Talbert <s...@techie.net>:
> The audacity package needs a small change and rebuild in rawhide after I
> merged c
The audacity package needs a small change and rebuild in rawhide after I
merged compat-wxGTK3-gtk2 into wxGTK3. Can someone please merge this PR
[1] (can provenpackagers merge arbitrary PR's on src.fedoraproject.org?),
or just commit this change and rebuild?
Thanks
Scott
[1] https
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:15:37AM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
It might be unrelated, but I've received broken dependency
notifications for nginx the past two days. I've never been a
maintainer or contributor to nginx. I did fork the repo in pagure,
just to look
looks like the query I used to export
> > > the ACLs from pkgdb wasn't restricted to active Fedora branch, so it
> > > tooks the old branch as well which ended up for you with two
> > > entries:
> > > rpms,audacity,mschwendt,commit,Approved
> > > rpms,
it tooks the old branch as well which ended up for you with
two entries:
rpms,audacity,mschwendt,commit,Approved
rpms,audacity,mschwendt,commit,Obsolete
The first line added you and the second one was ignored (I wasn't going to
migrate obsolete ACLs) so you can guess the outcome of that :)
Took
ra 13.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not listed as a maintainer in pkgdb, although there are three
> > > > "Obsolete" entries that have been inherited for many years it seems.
> > >
> > > You are marked as an admin in: https://src.fedora
h there are three
> > > "Obsolete" entries that have been inherited for many years it seems.
> >
> > You are marked as an admin in: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/audacity
> > but looking at pkgdb, I am indeed not quite able to say why that is.
> >
>
rs it seems.
>
> You are marked as an admin in: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/audacity
> but looking at pkgdb, I am indeed not quite able to say why that is.
>
> I'll try to find more information about this.
Data migration bug. It's not only "audacity". Other anci
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 05:01:03PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 11:58:56 + (UTC), buildsys fedoraproject org wrote:
>
> > audacity has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> > On x86_64:
> > audacity-2.1.3-6.fc28.x86_64 requires l
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 05:26:04PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-10-08 at 17:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 11:58:56 + (UTC), buildsys fedoraproject org
> > wrote:
> >
> > > audacity has broken dependencies in the
On Sun, 2017-10-08 at 17:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 11:58:56 + (UTC), buildsys fedoraproject org
> wrote:
>
> > audacity has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> > On x86_64:
> > audacity-2.1.3-6.fc28.x86_64 requires lib
On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 11:58:56 + (UTC), buildsys fedoraproject org wrote:
> audacity has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> On x86_64:
> audacity-2.1.3-6.fc28.x86_64 requires libwx_baseu-3.0-gtk2.so.0()(64bit)
-snip-
Why do I get such an email?
I've not been a m
On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 02:23 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I hope that will never be true, specially when we are comparing with
> rawhide or a not final release, because if can't build in rawhide or
> pre-alfa versions, it shouldn't make us stop to update a previous
> version ...
I was wrong, Kevin
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> or I suppose you could add an Epoch.
Epoch would not help here. The Epoch would have to be bumped in Rawhide,
where the package does not build at all, not even the old version.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Dom, 2016-03-06 at 15:52 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 08:14 +1100, David Timms wrote:
> >
> > Can I ignore that an push the build anyway for F23 (I can't see the
> > push
> > button) ?
> Unfortunately no, as that would break upgrades to F24. You might be
> stuck
Hi,
On Seg, 2016-03-07 at 08:14 +1100, David Timms wrote:
> On 05/03/16 13:37, notificati...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> >
> > upgradepath FAILED for audacity-2.1.2-3.fc23
> > https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/119e1b68-e27b
> > -11e5-a932-525400
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:14:47 +1100
David Timms <dti...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
> On 05/03/16 13:37, notificati...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > upgradepath FAILED for audacity-2.1.2-3.fc23
> >
> > https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/119e1b68-e27b-11e5-a9
On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 08:14 +1100, David Timms wrote:
> Can I ignore that an push the build anyway for F23 (I can't see the
> push
> button) ?
Unfortunately no, as that would break upgrades to F24. You might be
stuck until that gets fixed.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 05/03/16 13:37, notificati...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> upgradepath FAILED for audacity-2.1.2-3.fc23
>
> https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/119e1b68-e27b-11e5-a932-525400120b80/task_output/audacity-2.1.2-3.fc23.log
Hi, I've received the above notification fr
Hi any GTk3 or WxWidgets devs,
In Audacity (next), upstream has moved to wxGTK3. The only visible issue
I can see is with the placement of text within drop down fields.
The text is too low, and if it's too wide, the combo box isn't resizing
to fit the width. [1]
Just wondered
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, David Timms wrote:
Hi any GTk3 or WxWidgets devs,
In Audacity (next), upstream has moved to wxGTK3. The only visible issue
I can see is with the placement of text within drop down fields.
The text is too low, and if it's too wide, the combo box isn't resizing
to fit
On 24/11/15 01:29, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, David Timms wrote:
>
> When updating my code for wxGTK3, there were some places where I had to
> add a Layout() call to my wxPanel after adding items to a wxChoice in
> order to get it to size correctly. The same code worked just
Hi, I would welcome any feedback about the epel-7 updates-testing
candidate for Audacity 2.1.1. It's available from the [Builds] link at:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7245/audacity-2.1.1-1.el7
If you can, thanks for your testing
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 19:55 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400
Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
This is nonsense. There are enough licenses for the linux
environment. A
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:47:55PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Hi,
On 04/30/2013 10:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
New packages for soxr have been requested for updates-testing for 18 and 19.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132
That should help Hans if he chooses to update audacity to the latest version.
Thanks!
Regards,
Hans
--
devel
Hi,
On 04/29/2013 05:55 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion.
I'm about to kick it out of the later repository.
This is not true for at least Fedora, I've pingened
the maintainer (David Timms) about the 2.0.3 update in bugzilla:
https
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400
Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
This is nonsense. There are enough licenses for the linux
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:50 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com
wrote:
I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review
request?
Since nobody else jumped up, I'll take it. I
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400
Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:47:55PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 29
New packages for soxr have been requested for updates-testing for 18 and
19.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132
That should help Hans if he chooses to update audacity to the latest
version.
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to
get this particular build working?
please move this question to rpmfusion Maling lists
On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 10:28 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery
richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it
won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:35:12 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 10:28 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery
richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken
:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken -
it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is
it possible to get this particular build working?
I think what you're looking for is the audacity-freeworld add-on
package from RPM Fusion, probably
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion.
I'm about to kick it out of the later repository.
Nicolas (kwizart)
2013/4/28 Richard Vickery richard.vicker...@gmail.com
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
install - and mp3 support is rather important
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion.
That's doesn't appear to be true.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/audacity
Now, if the maintainer isn't being responsive, we have other ways
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.comwrote:
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion.
That's doesn't appear to be true.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name
I still have it on my system and use it, what else is there to use?
Thanks,
Phillip Lynn
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 17:55 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion.
I'm about to kick it out of the later repository.
Nicolas (kwizart)
2013/4
I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review
request?
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 2:23 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
MP3 is patented, and there are *no* licenses available for Linux
environments.
This is nonsense. There are enough licenses for the linux
environment.
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400
Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
This is nonsense. There are enough licenses for the linux
environment. A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that
work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open
source mp3 en/decoder.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400
Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
This is nonsense. There are enough licenses for the linux
environment. A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that
work on the
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
Neither of which address the existing MP3 patent issues, only software
copyright issues. Mind you, Most of these patents are finally
expiring, and the existing court cases have been oddm and usually
settled out of
On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to
get this particular build working?
What do you mean with Audacity mp3 build is broken
On 04/30/2013 03:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to
get this particular build working?
What do you mean
On 04/29/2013 08:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review
request?
Thanks,
Richard
Sure.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review
request?
Since nobody else jumped up, I'll take it. I probably won't have time
to review it until Wednesday, so take your time. :-)
BTW, it looks
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get
this particular build working?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:09:30 -0700
Richard Vickery richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible
to get this particular build working?
Important or otherwise, Fedora
On Apr 28, 2013 7:21 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:09:30 -0700
Richard Vickery richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery
richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get
this particular build working?
I think what you're looking
, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery
richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get
this particular build working?
I think what you're looking for is the audacity
that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible
to get this particular build working?
Important or otherwise, Fedora don't build in mp3 support ootb
You need to travel another road.
I thought we did, acknowledging that we
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Richard Vickery
richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get
this particular build working?
MP3 players, and the DVD
Le dimanche 28 avril 2013 à 13:08 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit :
There's also the Penguin Liberation Front for a few components with
weird licensing that others haven't been able to resolve usable
licenses for.
PLF closed a few weeks ago[1], and was for Mandriva.
[1]
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
MP3 is patented, and there are *no* licenses available for Linux
environments.
This is nonsense. There are enough licenses for the linux
environment. A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that work
on the
Hi David:
Have you received an indication from anyone to do this? I would like to
help test it; how am I to get it off the site using Google-Chrome?
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:58 AM, David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hi, It appears Audacity is getting close to v2 release (it's been in 1.3
On 18/02/12 09:46, Richard Vickery wrote:
Have you received an indication from anyone to do this?
No, actually. Although I thought I sent it to the test list but see now
I sent to devel.
I would like to
help test it; how am I to get it off the site using Google-Chrome?
Looks like I built a
Hi, It appears Audacity is getting close to v2 release (it's been in 1.3
beta mode for a few years).
I've built the current svn release as 2.0.0.alpha... , and request
anyone with audio hardware who would like to help to download and
install it to check whichever functions you feel like
88 matches
Mail list logo
