On Sat, 31 May 2014 00:31:50 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
As of 2014, I only know two cases where clang is still better: more complete
caret diagnostics, and better recovery from invalid types (clang provides
suggestions and uses it for the rest of the compilation to avoid cascaded
error
2014-05-29 22:28 GMT+02:00 Tim St Clair tstcl...@redhat.com:
I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
At a first glance this seems like a bug in llvm-config, nothing obviously
related to “default” cflags.
On 05/29/2014 10:28 PM, Tim St Clair wrote:
I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various reasons, is
there anyone who knows a workaround or fix?
I think FPC (and/or
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:25:28AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/29/2014 10:28 PM, Tim St Clair wrote:
I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various reasons,
is
standards and practices for Fedora
packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 4:03:57 AM
Subject: Re: fedoras default cflags clang
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:25:28AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/29/2014 10:28 PM, Tim St Clair wrote:
I've been seeing this bug crop
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 10:03 -0400, Tim St Clair wrote:
I'm primarily referring to development compilation, not necessarily
packaging.
The default CFLAGS cause clang to fail 'out of the gate'. Given the
popularity rise in the compiler, and the increase # of open tickets
upstream around
Il 30/05/2014 11:03, Jakub Jelinek ha scritto:
Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various reasons,
is there anyone who knows a workaround or fix?
I think FPC (and/or FESCO) should decide on whether we want to
allow/disallow using clang for official Fedora rpms.
Tim St Clair wrote:
I'm primarily referring to development compilation, not necessarily
packaging.
Non-RPM compilation shouldn't be ending up with distro CFLAGS at all.
(They're called RPM_OPT_FLAGS for a reason.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various reasons, is
there anyone who knows a workaround or fix?
--
Cheers,
Tim
Freedom, Features, Friends, First - Fedora
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:28:18PM -0400, Tim St Clair wrote:
I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various
reasons, is there anyone who knows a workaround or fix?
If
10 matches
Mail list logo
