Re: gimp license corrected

Josef Řídký wrote: > The file-dds plugin directory has available COPYING file which is > GPL-2.0-only original text (with accuracy 0.983). It is normal for GPL-2.0-or-later code to come with a copy of the GPLv2 COPYING. You cannot distinguish GPL-2.0-only from GPL-2.0-or-later from the COPYING

Re: gimp license corrected

So, without getting into the issue of whether it actually makes sense to track differences between GPLvn "only" vs "or-later", since this is just continuing a practice that was in place in Fedora for years (I think ever since 2008 at least?): This is where you can't really rely on askalono,

Re: gimp license corrected

This license was mentioned in the output of the 'askalono' command run over the gimp source code. The file-dds plugin directory has available COPYING file which is GPL-2.0-only original text (with accuracy 0.983). It's true that no other checks were made upon files there as I didn't expect to

Re: gimp license corrected

On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 3:54 AM Josef Řídký wrote: > The GIMP application core, and other portions of the official GIMP > distribution not explicitly licensed otherwise, are licensed under the > GPL-3.0-only > > Explicitly licensed under GPL-2.0-only is 'file-dds' plugin. > Curious why you say

Re: gimp license corrected

On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 09:53:25AM +0200, Josef Řídký wrote: > The GIMP application core, and other portions of the official GIMP > distribution > not explicitly licensed otherwise, are licensed under the GPL-3.0-only > > Explicitly licensed under GPL-2.0-only is 'file-dds' plugin. > Explicitly

Re: gimp license corrected

The GIMP application core, and other portions of the official GIMP distribution not explicitly licensed otherwise, are licensed under the GPL-3.0-only Explicitly licensed under GPL-2.0-only is 'file-dds' plugin. Explicitly licensed under BSD-3-Clause are 'script-fu/ftx' and 'script-fu/tinyscheme'

Re: gimp license corrected

Josef Řídký wrote: > Based on the SPDX requirements, that should be correct. Some parts of the > package are available under GPL-2.0-only and some under GPL-3.0-only > license. And they are not linked together? Because if they are, we have a problem! Kevin Kofler

Re: gimp license corrected

Based on the SPDX requirements, that should be correct. Some parts of the package are available under GPL-2.0-only and some under GPL-3.0-only license. Best regards Josef Ridky Senior Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:34 PM Kevin Kofler via

Re: gimp license corrected

Josef Řídký wrote: > AND GPL-2.0-only AND GPL-3.0-only Oops? Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: gimp license corrected

Good point. Thanks for the typo correction. Best regards Josef Ridky Senior Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 2:35 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 8:22 AM Josef Řídký wrote: > > > > A license of "gimp" package was corrected from

Re: gimp license corrected

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 8:22 AM Josef Řídký wrote: > > A license of "gimp" package was corrected from > GPLv3+ and GPLv3 > to > GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-only AND GPL-3.0-only AND BSD-3.0-Clause > Do you mean "BSD-3-Clause"? I don't know of a "BSD-3.0-Clause"... -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always,

gimp license corrected

A license of "gimp" package was corrected from GPLv3+ and GPLv3 to GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-only AND GPL-3.0-only AND BSD-3.0-Clause in Fedora Rawhide Best regards Josef Ridky Senior Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.