Re: lvresize and XFS, was: default file system

2014-02-28 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
Dne 28.2.2014 00:02, Eric Sandeen napsal(a): On 2/27/14, 4:40 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote: On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:08:46PM -0500, James Wilson

Re: lvresize and XFS, was: default file system

2014-02-28 Thread Chris Murphy
On Feb 28, 2014, at 1:33 AM, Zdenek Kabelac zkabe...@redhat.com wrote: fsadm failed: 3 man fsadm DIAGNOSTICS On successful completion, the status code is 0. A status code of 2 indicates the operation was interrupted by the user. A status code of 3 indicates the

Re: lvresize and XFS, was: default file system

2014-02-28 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
Dne 28.2.2014 14:37, Chris Murphy napsal(a): On Feb 28, 2014, at 1:33 AM, Zdenek Kabelac zkabe...@redhat.com wrote: fsadm failed: 3 man fsadm DIAGNOSTICS On successful completion, the status code is 0. A status code of 2 indicates the operation was interrupted by the

Re: lvresize and XFS, was: default file system

2014-02-28 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 2/28/14, 7:54 AM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: Dne 28.2.2014 14:37, Chris Murphy napsal(a): On Feb 28, 2014, at 1:33 AM, Zdenek Kabelac zkabe...@redhat.com wrote: fsadm failed: 3 man fsadm DIAGNOSTICS On successful completion, the status code is 0. A status code of 2

Re: lvresize and XFS, was: default file system

2014-02-28 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 2/28/14, 8:12 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: However, I see that (at least my copy of) fsadm requires xfs_check, which has been deprecated upstream in favor of xfs_repair -n. xfs_check doesn't scale, and xfs_repair -n performs the same tasks. XFS_CHECK=xfs_check so I guess I should file a

Re: lvresize and XFS, was: default file system

2014-02-28 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
Dne 28.2.2014 15:12, Eric Sandeen napsal(a): On 2/28/14, 7:54 AM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: Dne 28.2.2014 14:37, Chris Murphy napsal(a): On Feb 28, 2014, at 1:33 AM, Zdenek Kabelac zkabe...@redhat.com wrote: fsadm failed: 3 man fsadm DIAGNOSTICS On successful completion,

lvresize and XFS, was: default file system

2014-02-27 Thread Chris Murphy
On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote: On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:08:46PM -0500, James Wilson Harshaw IV wrote: A question I have is XFS worth it? I have done some testing with RHEL 7 Beta which use XFS as a default file system. I have to recorgnize,

Re: lvresize and XFS, was: default file system

2014-02-27 Thread Chris Murphy
On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote: On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:08:46PM -0500, James Wilson Harshaw IV wrote: A question I have is XFS worth it? I have done some testing with

Re: lvresize and XFS, was: default file system

2014-02-27 Thread James Harshaw
So far my small of research shows it isn't that big of a problem. We should look more into it thought. On Feb 27, 2014 5:41 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Jochen Schmitt

Re: lvresize and XFS, was: default file system

2014-02-27 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 2/27/14, 4:40 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote: On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:08:46PM -0500, James Wilson Harshaw IV wrote: A question I have is XFS

Re: lvresize and XFS, was: default file system

2014-02-27 Thread James Harshaw
Haha! Error: stuff happened. On Feb 27, 2014 6:02 PM, Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com wrote: On 2/27/14, 4:40 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote: