On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 01:08:12PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 02:46:19PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > I don't see email notifications about successful and failed builds,
> > even though they seem to be happening in Koji and from the above
> > lists. Is it
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 02:46:19PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I don't see email notifications about successful and failed builds,
> even though they seem to be happening in Koji and from the above
> lists. Is it being slow or broken?
Yeah, it got stuck. I restarted it this morning and
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Scott Talbert wrote:
Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild will be done in a
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild will be done in
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 2:43 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
> on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
> changes listed in:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
>
>
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:27:59PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
> on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
> changes listed in:
>
>
Hi all,
sorry for the empty commit messages, we have migrated the script from
fedpkg to plain git command to allows empty commits for rmpautospec enabled
packages.
The bug is now fixed and the script re-run, some packages will have one
empty commit followed by the actual mass rebuild commit.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:35:37AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 9:30 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> > On 21/07/2021 17:15, Jerry James wrote:
> > > In fact, the ones I've looked at are empty commits. There is a commit
> > > message, but no changes of any kind to
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 9:30 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
> On 21/07/2021 17:15, Jerry James wrote:
> > In fact, the ones I've looked at are empty commits. There is a commit
> > message, but no changes of any kind to the spec file: no release bump,
> > no changelog entry.
>
> Yes, I can
On 21/07/2021 17:15, Jerry James wrote:
In fact, the ones I've looked at are empty commits. There is a commit
message, but no changes of any kind to the spec file: no release bump,
no changelog entry.
Yes, I can confirm[1]:
Authored and Committed by releng 3 hours ago
0 file changed. 0 lines
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 9:01 AM Scott Talbert wrote:
> It doesn't look like the mass rebuild is committing any changelog changes
> to the specfiles it's rebuilding. Is that expected?
In fact, the ones I've looked at are empty commits. There is a commit
message, but no changes of any kind to
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild will be
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (f35-rebuild) and moved
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (f35-rebuild) and moved
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:02:47PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I fired off blind rebuilds of all R packages on the tracker bug.
> I looked attached logs for the first few, and they all failed because
> R-core failed on the libgfortran.so.3 dep. Since R was built a few
> days ago,
I fired off blind rebuilds of all R packages on the tracker bug.
I looked attached logs for the first few, and they all failed because
R-core failed on the libgfortran.so.3 dep. Since R was built a few
days ago, chances are that many of the dependent packages will now build
fine. Let's see how
Hi all,
Status update on the mass rebuild, at this time the releng side of things has
been completed, all FTBFS bugs have been filed and can be tracked at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423041
The current full list of failures can be found at
On 06/09/2014 09:03 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 06/09/2014 08:31 PM, Jerry James wrote:
Another source of Java build failures may be that the
javapackages-tools package is not self-consistent about where maven
dep fragments should live; see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:49:05 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Ter, 2014-06-10 at 17:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at
* Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com [2014-06-09 11:35]:
That's likely because both OpenJDK7 and OpenJDK8 both provide
java-devel (based on a the repo as it stood at yesterday's compose so
it doesn't include the mass rebuild packages):
# repoquery --whatprovides java-devel
* Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com [2014-06-09 12:01]:
In the xorg-x11-docs case it's explicitly BuildRequires:
java-1.7.0-openjdk;
Okay. Please don't do that. Use java-devel. Otherwise, this will break
on future updates to Java 8, 9 an later ones.
changing it to plain java-devel actually fixes
Hi,
On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
[2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html
Mass rebuild stopped ? or script stopped ?
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
[2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html
Mass rebuild stopped ? or script stopped ?
Not
On Ter, 2014-06-10 at 17:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
[2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html
Mass rebuild stopped ? or
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Ter, 2014-06-10 at 17:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
[2]
Dne 8.6.2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 08:51:06AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
You can see the current list of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:13:27 -0400
Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com wrote:
Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon.
If I do so sooner rather than later, would that clear the coda FTBFS,
or is it too late to remove the
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
xorg-x11-docs apparently fails to rebuild because something is horribly
wrong in java land:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 16:35 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
That's likely because both OpenJDK7 and OpenJDK8 both provide
java-devel (based on a the repo as it stood at yesterday's compose so
it doesn't include the mass rebuild packages):
# repoquery --whatprovides java-devel
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:34:51AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:13:27 -0400
Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com wrote:
Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon.
If I do so sooner rather than
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
xorg-x11-docs apparently fails to rebuild because something is horribly
wrong in java land:
Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
org/apache/avalon/framework/configuration/ConfigurationException :
On 06/09/2014 08:31 PM, Jerry James wrote:
Another source of Java build failures may be that the
javapackages-tools package is not self-consistent about where maven
dep fragments should live; see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106919.
I believe that this is a documentation bug,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script tells me it is Checking 13923 builds... there is a
Il 08/06/2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script
Il 08/06/2014 20:20, punto...@libero.it ha scritto:
Il 08/06/2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script tells me it is Checking 13923 builds... there is a
very large number of failures[1]. There
On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 20:20:32 +0200
punto...@libero.it punto...@libero.it wrote:
hi
thanks for your work!
now i have some problems for rebuild my packages
DEBUG util.py:331: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum',
'--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f21-build-2154600-393050/root/',
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 12:37:00 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
lvm2's spec isn't very friendly to the rpmdev-bumpspec script that the
mass rebuild uses, so it is a bit messed up. They seem to redefine
'release' for every subpackage and the bumpspec script tries to
increment all of them and the
The srpm buildroot was still broken, this time by rpkg.
There was a rpkg build 2014-03-24 10:05:16 with a upstream version bump,
but it was untagged before going out in a rawhide compose and wasn't
ever fixed. Then the mass rebuild built it and landed it in the
buildroot.
If you commit things
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I have merged perl info f20 and started the mass rebuild.
Hi!
A friendly reminder - Branch Fedora 20 from Rawhide is planned
On 08/19/2013 01:32 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I have merged perl info f20 and started the mass rebuild.
Hi!
A friendly reminder - Branch
在 2013-8-19 PM7:49，Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de写道：
Please postpone this. IMO, this is much too early.
Also take into account what time of year it is: Summer Holidays (at least
in Europe).
Many people have been on vacation and some still are (Around here, summer
holidays end early/mid
- Original Message -
On 08/19/2013 01:32 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I have merged perl info f20 and started the mass
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On 08/19/2013 01:32 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 08/19/2013 02:21 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On 08/19/2013 01:32 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I have merged
On 08/19/2013 02:25 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On 08/19/2013 01:32 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Original Message -
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com writes:
Maybe we need to put a mass rebuild starts point in the Schedule in
the future so that people are more aware of this and have the sorts of
features like a perl rebase done in reasonable time.
That would be useful.
Thanks,
PM
--
devel mailing list
On 2013-08-05 17:16, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 10:50:18 +0200
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
are there any tracker bugs created for eg. the %doc change and for Lua
changes so the mass created bugs can be properly classified before
they are resolved?
Not that i know of, it
On 08/05/2013 04:35 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
There is a large number of failures[1] that need to be
addressed.
Dennis
Do you have also numbers how many FTBFS we had in F19 and F20? It might
be good for post mortem of Fedora rebuilds.
I thought the rebuild should start after all tasks
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/05/2013 04:35 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
There is a large number of failures[1] that need to be
addressed.
Dennis
Do you have also numbers how many FTBFS we had in F19 and F20? It might be
good for post
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 08:44:23 +0200
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/05/2013 04:35 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
There is a large number of failures[1] that need to be
addressed.
Dennis
Do you have also numbers how many
- Original Message -
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 08/05/2013 04:35 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
There is a large number of failures[1] that need to be
addressed.
Dennis
Do you have also numbers how many FTBFS we had in
Hi!
On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 21:35 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
There is a large number of failures[1] that need to be
addressed.
I don't know if this is just a coincidence, but the links to log files
in the filled FTBFS bug reports don't work.
Here are two examples (from my FTBFS bugs):
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 21:35:19 -0500
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
we did make some changes on the x86 builders post f19 mass rebuild
which helped disk IO on them. but this is by far the fastest mass
rebuild to date. There is a large number of failures[1] that need to
be addressed.
are
On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 21:35 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
There is a large number of failures[1] that need to be
addressed.
I don't know if this is just a coincidence, but the links to log files
in the filled FTBFS bug reports don't work.
Here are two examples (from my FTBFS bugs):
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 21:35 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
There is a large number of failures[1] that need to be
addressed.
I don't know if this is just a coincidence, but the links to log files
in the filled
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 11:37 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why don't you just go to koji and have a look at it directly
there.
Of course one could do that, but then if you put the links there,
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Tadej Janež
tadej.ja...@tadej.hicsalta.siwrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 21:35 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
There is a large number of failures[1] that need to be
addressed.
I don't know if this is just a coincidence, but the links to log files
in
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:14:55AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
going forward we need to work out how to do the
perl builds quicker. there really is no reason why it needs to take as
long as it does.
Maybe only rebuild things that have a buildrequires on perl ?
None of the rebuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/2013 10:06 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:14:55AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
going forward we need to work out how to do the perl builds
quicker. there really is no reason why it needs to take as long
as it does.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:44:06 +0200
Tadej Janež tadej.ja...@tadej.hicsalta.si wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 21:35 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
There is a large number of failures[1] that need to be
addressed.
I don't know if this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 10:50:18 +0200
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 21:35:19 -0500
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
we did make some changes on the x86 builders post f19 mass rebuild
which helped disk IO on them. but this
Il 03/08/2013 07:07, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
Hi all,
I have merged perl info f20 and started the mass rebuild.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at the end of the initial run
though we will file bugs for all FTBFS.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks to the addition of arm and its 48 builders the releng pass
though on the mass rebuild is done.
for a comparison to f19
f19:
Feb 13: 1096
Feb 14: 1445
Feb 15: 1548
Feb 16: 2175
Feb 17: 1168
Feb 18: 1476
Feb 19: 2
f20:
Aug 02:1261
Aug
Many Perl packages has wrong Requires of 5.16, and because of this I
cannot update installed perl on my system to 5.18.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks to the addition of arm and its 48 builders the releng pass
though on the mass rebuild is done.
for a comparison to f19
f19:
Feb 13: 1096
Feb 14: 1445
Feb 15: 1548
Feb 16: 2175
Feb 17: 1168
Feb 18: 1476
Feb 19: 2
f20:
Aug 02:1261
Aug
Il 03/08/2013 07:07, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
Hi all,
I have merged perl info f20 and started the mass rebuild.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at the end of the initial run
though we will file bugs for all FTBFS.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I have merged perl info f20 and started the mass rebuild.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at the end of the initial run
though we will file bugs for all FTBFS.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I have merged perl info f20 and started the mass rebuild.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at the end of the initial run
though we will file bugs for all FTBFS.
74 matches
Mail list logo
