Am 31.10.2013 16:14, schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:56:53 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken
i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on
a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download
the openssl
Am 01.11.2013 04:08, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Reindl Harald wrote:
but sadly you can't do Requires: package.x86_64 explicitly
You can actually:
Requires: openssl(x86-64)
See also the %{_isa} macro
you can't, been there done that in trying to list i686 packages
Requires: openssl-libs(i686)
On 11/15/2013 10:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.11.2013 04:08, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Reindl Harald wrote:
but sadly you can't do Requires: package.x86_64 explicitly
You can actually:
Requires: openssl(x86-64)
See also the %{_isa} macro
you can't, been there done that in trying to list
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:41:11 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openssl\* did not work because
different versions for x86_64 and i686 and so i downloaded it from koji
Why did you have openssl.i686 installed on x86_64 to begin with?
You have messed up
currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken
i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on
a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download
the openssl packages for both archs from koji and
doing a yum localupdate worked fine
Error: Package:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:12:41 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken
i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on
a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download
the openssl packages for both archs from koji and
doing a yum
Am 31.10.2013 13:49, schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:12:41 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken
i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on
a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download
the openssl
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:56:53 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken
i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on
a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download
the openssl packages for both archs from koji and
doing a yum
Am 31.10.2013 16:14, schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:56:53 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken
i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on
a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download
the openssl packages
Michael Schwendt mschwendt at gmail.com writes:
Skype is not included with Fedora. Skype does not (and cannot) influence
which packages are multilib'ed when the repos are composed. Skype 32-bit
doesn't depend on openssl. What on your machine depends on 32-bit openssl
and not openssl-libs?
In
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:29:18 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Why did you have openssl.i686 installed on x86_64 to begin with?
You have messed up your installation. :-(
Have you use rpm -Uvh instead of rpm -Fvh? Or why have you installed
openssl.i686?
the machine has a long history
Well,
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:10:02 + (UTC), Andre Robatino wrote:
In F16, when I had 32-bit packages (namely Skype and Fedora's wine)
installed, I had both openssl.i686 and openssl.x86_64 installed, so
Indeed. Up to F17, but not anymore since F18:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 17:32 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
But watch this on F20 x86_64:
# repoquery --releasever=17 --exactdeps --whatrequires 'openssl(x86-32)'
openssl-devel-1:1.0.0i-1.fc17.i686
openssl-devel-1:1.0.0k-1.fc17.i686
So, openssl-devel.i686 required openssl.i686
Am 31.10.2013 17:27, schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:29:18 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Why did you have openssl.i686 installed on x86_64 to begin with?
You have messed up your installation. :-(
Have you use rpm -Uvh instead of rpm -Fvh? Or why have you installed
Reindl Harald wrote:
but sadly you can't do Requires: package.x86_64 explicitly
You can actually:
Requires: openssl(x86-64)
See also the %{_isa} macro.
http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/ArchDependencies
(This is also what Michael Schwendt's repoquery invocation in this thread
checked for.)
15 matches
Mail list logo