Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-11-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 31.10.2013 16:14, schrieb Michael Schwendt: On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:56:53 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download the openssl

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-11-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 01.11.2013 04:08, schrieb Kevin Kofler: Reindl Harald wrote: but sadly you can't do Requires: package.x86_64 explicitly You can actually: Requires: openssl(x86-64) See also the %{_isa} macro you can't, been there done that in trying to list i686 packages Requires: openssl-libs(i686)

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-11-15 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 11/15/2013 10:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 01.11.2013 04:08, schrieb Kevin Kofler: Reindl Harald wrote: but sadly you can't do Requires: package.x86_64 explicitly You can actually: Requires: openssl(x86-64) See also the %{_isa} macro you can't, been there done that in trying to list

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-11-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:41:11 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openssl\* did not work because different versions for x86_64 and i686 and so i downloaded it from koji Why did you have openssl.i686 installed on x86_64 to begin with? You have messed up

openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Reindl Harald
currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download the openssl packages for both archs from koji and doing a yum localupdate worked fine Error: Package:

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:12:41 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download the openssl packages for both archs from koji and doing a yum

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 31.10.2013 13:49, schrieb Michael Schwendt: On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:12:41 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download the openssl

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:56:53 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download the openssl packages for both archs from koji and doing a yum

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 31.10.2013 16:14, schrieb Michael Schwendt: On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:56:53 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: currently on a x86_64 system distro-sync to F19 is broken i saw the same in F18 with updates-testing enabled on a machine with i686 packages some days ago and download the openssl packages

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Andre Robatino
Michael Schwendt mschwendt at gmail.com writes: Skype is not included with Fedora. Skype does not (and cannot) influence which packages are multilib'ed when the repos are composed. Skype 32-bit doesn't depend on openssl. What on your machine depends on 32-bit openssl and not openssl-libs? In

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:29:18 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Why did you have openssl.i686 installed on x86_64 to begin with? You have messed up your installation. :-( Have you use rpm -Uvh instead of rpm -Fvh? Or why have you installed openssl.i686? the machine has a long history Well,

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:10:02 + (UTC), Andre Robatino wrote: In F16, when I had 32-bit packages (namely Skype and Fedora's wine) installed, I had both openssl.i686 and openssl.x86_64 installed, so Indeed. Up to F17, but not anymore since F18:

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 17:32 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: But watch this on F20 x86_64: # repoquery --releasever=17 --exactdeps --whatrequires 'openssl(x86-32)' openssl-devel-1:1.0.0i-1.fc17.i686 openssl-devel-1:1.0.0k-1.fc17.i686 So, openssl-devel.i686 required openssl.i686

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 31.10.2013 17:27, schrieb Michael Schwendt: On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:29:18 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Why did you have openssl.i686 installed on x86_64 to begin with? You have messed up your installation. :-( Have you use rpm -Uvh instead of rpm -Fvh? Or why have you installed

Re: openssl multilib broken

2013-10-31 Thread Kevin Kofler
Reindl Harald wrote: but sadly you can't do Requires: package.x86_64 explicitly You can actually: Requires: openssl(x86-64) See also the %{_isa} macro. http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/ArchDependencies (This is also what Michael Schwendt's repoquery invocation in this thread checked for.)