On 9/8/21 06:28, Sérgio Basto wrote:
I think the gui of pdftk that I used is pdfchain, I also built pdfchain
in my copr repo [3] , if both packages works well I can unretire them .
Thank you
fyi, here on f34
dnf install bouncycastle
rpm -Uvh \
On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 23:29 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 16:38 +, Nils K wrote:
> > 7 years later I find this and was surprised after switching from
> > Debian/Ubuntu.
> > I cannot find the source or any licensing information for current
> > versions however there are
Depending on what you want to achieve, mupdf and its tools may be an option.
Back then I switched impressive from pdftk to mupdf/mutool. It has python
bindings, too.
As for a "swiss army knife" command line utility, qpdf is very versatile if you
don't mind the learning curve. There is a gui
On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 16:38 +, Nils K wrote:
> 7 years later I find this and was surprised after switching from
> Debian/Ubuntu.
> I cannot find the source or any licensing information for current
> versions however there are several alternatives.
> One which is already in the repos is
7 years later I find this and was surprised after switching from Debian/Ubuntu.
I cannot find the source or any licensing information for current versions
however there are several alternatives.
One which is already in the repos is pdf-stapler which is good for the basics
but lacks some of the
On 03/24/2014 12:48 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 03/22/2014 07:51 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 03/19/2014 10:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
And JDK5 might be good enough for the use
On 03/22/2014 07:51 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 03/19/2014 10:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
And JDK5 might be good enough for the use required. It doesn't claim
to be anything more than that, so I don't see the harm in leaving it there.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 03/22/2014 07:51 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 03/19/2014 10:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
And JDK5 might be good enough for the use required. It doesn't claim
to be anything more than
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 03/19/2014 10:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
And JDK5 might be good enough for the use required. It doesn't claim
to be anything more than that, so I don't see the harm in leaving it there.
Speaking as the upstream maintainer, I do.
Hi
On 03/19/2014 10:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
On 03/08/2014 03:37 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Sorry I am missing something. Why can't we keep the old pdftk that
works with itext2?
Check the whole thread -
- Original Message -
On 03/08/2014 03:37 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Sorry I am missing something. Why can't we keep the old pdftk that
works with itext2?
Check the whole thread - because of GCJ dependency. iText is second
Hi
And JDK5 might be good enough for the use required. It doesn't claim
to be anything more than that, so I don't see the harm in leaving it
there.
We don't orphan or retire packages based on harm. We do it when there is
noone volunteering to maintain it. If you care about GCJ, step up
On 03/08/2014 03:37 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Sorry I am missing something. Why can't we keep the old pdftk that
works with itext2?
Check the whole thread - because of GCJ dependency. iText is second
issue. The first could be fixed by
Quoting Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org:
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:52:27 -0500
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
That are the two reasons why I'm not able to support pdftk on
Fedora anymore and was forced to reitred this package. I'm sorry
for nayone who maintaining any
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
The only things I read in the thread are GCJ is abandoned and we
really want to get rid of GCJ. Am I supposed to come to the
conclusion that the GCJ package is dropped from Fedora? If so, where
is this decision made? Why was it made without consulting GCJ users?
We have
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:52:27 -0500
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
That are the two reasons why I'm not able to support pdftk on
Fedora anymore and was forced to reitred this package. I'm sorry
for nayone who maintaining any package with dependencies on this
package.
This is why
On 03/07/2014 01:30 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:52:27 -0500
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
That are the two reasons why I'm not able to support pdftk on
Fedora anymore and was forced to reitred this package. I'm sorry
for nayone who maintaining any package with
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 03/06/2014 06:41 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:03:46PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
pdftk has a hard dependency on GCJ because it's a C++ program that
uses a Java library (iText) through CNI. I once tried to
- Original Message -
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 03/06/2014 06:41 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:03:46PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
pdftk has a hard dependency on GCJ because it's a C++ program that
uses a Java library (iText)
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Sorry I am missing something. Why can't we keep the old pdftk that
works with itext2?
Check the whole thread - because of GCJ dependency. iText is second
issue. The first could be fixed by rewrite of offending part of code
to Java but
I just git a broken dependencies notice for a package that I maintain.
The reason is that pdftk got retired just the other day.
I may have missed a corresponding post on fedora-devel, but I think a
heads up notice to maintainers of depending packages may be in order
before you retire a package,
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 11:31:18 +0100
Michael J Gruber m...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I just git a broken dependencies notice for a package that I maintain.
The reason is that pdftk got retired just the other day.
I may have missed a corresponding post on fedora-devel, but I think a
heads up
On 03/06/2014 11:31 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
As for pdftk: I see 2 failed builds for version 1.45 and none for the
current version 2.02 (which probably breaks the api anyways). What are
the plans? Retire pdftk completely? Start fresh with pdftk2?
pdftk has a hard dependency on GCJ because
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:03:46PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
pdftk has a hard dependency on GCJ because it's a C++ program that
uses a Java library (iText) through CNI. I once tried to rewrite
the C++ part in Java, but the existing command line parser is quite
involved, so I didn't quite
On 03/06/2014 12:03 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 11:31:18 +0100
Michael J Gruber m...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I just git a broken dependencies notice for a package that I maintain.
The reason is that pdftk got retired just the other day.
I may have missed a corresponding post
On 03/06/2014 06:41 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:03:46PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
pdftk has a hard dependency on GCJ because it's a C++ program that
uses a Java library (iText) through CNI. I once tried to rewrite
the C++ part in Java, but the existing command
26 matches
Mail list logo
