Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

2011-10-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Zoltan Kota wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: Just wondering if we have another reference tool in the repos? Anyone? Bibus, pybliographer? There's also KBibTex (which was recently ported from kdelibs 3 to kdelibs 4, the current Fedora 14

Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

2011-10-25 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 15:46 -0400, Alex Lancaster wrote: My sentiments exactly. Better not to keep known broken packages around; it's only going to cause grief for users if they find out they can't even install the package. Once it's fixed upstream to not rely on libgnomeuimm, it can

Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

2011-10-25 Thread Zoltan Kota
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Just wondering if we have another reference tool in the repos? Anyone? Bibus, pybliographer? Zoltan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

2011-10-24 Thread Kalev Lember
On 10/21/2011 09:37 PM, Alex Lancaster wrote: There is a branch that was started back in February to port to gio and away from libgnomemm: http://icculus.org/pipermail/referencer/2011-February/000534.html There was a commit to it in August, but looks the mm dep is still there in the

Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

2011-10-24 Thread Alex Lancaster
My sentiments exactly. Better not to keep known broken packages around; it's only going to cause grief for users if they find out they can't even install the package. Once it's fixed upstream to not rely on libgnomeuimm, it can easily be added back to Fedora. Alex, could you please

Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

2011-10-21 Thread Alex Lancaster
Hi Kalev, (Cc'ed to devel list to see if anybody else has suggestions). As you've noted libgnomeuimm has been obsoleted in f16 and higher, and referencer doesn't look like it's ported to use anything else. I filed a bug in what appears to be a (potentially) active (but slow) upstream to get some