On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 10:55:58AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Sat, May 18, 2024 at 08:20:53PM +0200, Sandro napsal(a):
> > On 16-05-2024 13:14, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > A workaround could be rpm-build or mock to register rpm-build package in
> > > /etc/dnf/protected.d configuration files. Packages
V Sat, May 18, 2024 at 08:20:53PM +0200, Sandro napsal(a):
> On 16-05-2024 13:14, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > A workaround could be rpm-build or mock to register rpm-build package in
> > /etc/dnf/protected.d configuration files. Packages listed there are
> > prevented
> > from removal no matter of --all
On 16-05-2024 13:14, Petr Pisar wrote:
A workaround could be rpm-build or mock to register rpm-build package in
/etc/dnf/protected.d configuration files. Packages listed there are prevented
from removal no matter of --allow-erasing.
A bit late to the party, but I was wondering if making `add-de
On Fri, 17 May 2024 13:32:24 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Oh, this is embarrasing. I added two patches but they didn't get
> > applied because %setup not %autosetup. :(
> > I'll push a fixed build in a moment. Sorry for breaking the builds.
> >
>
> perl-Finance-Quote-1.6200-1.fc
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 12:19:34PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 09:43:22AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 May 2024 10:52:29 +
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:09:01AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 09:43:22AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2024 10:52:29 +
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:09:01AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > This looks like you're putting the resolver between a rock and a
> > > hard place. :
Dne 17. 05. 24 v 7:16 Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
On 5/16/24 16:10, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 16. 05. 24 v 14:28 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:14:16PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
Proper solution is actually minimazing content of the minimal build
root
Most of th
On Thu, 16 May 2024 10:52:29 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:09:01AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > This looks like you're putting the resolver between a rock and a
> > hard place. :thinking:
> > I don't think I've ever seen packages being *removed* when
>
On 5/16/24 16:10, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 16. 05. 24 v 14:28 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:14:16PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
Proper solution is actually minimazing content of the minimal build root
Most of the packages in the buildroot are libraries, pulled i
Neal Gompa wrote:
> I have the question of why is dnf5 running as if "--allow-erasing" is
> always passed to it? Older versions of DNF explicitly didn't do that
> because we get weird behaviors like this.
Without --allow-erasing (which was actually passed explicitly, as Petr Pisar
pointed out), t
Dne 16. 05. 24 v 14:28 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:14:16PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
Proper solution is actually minimazing content of the minimal build root
Most of the packages in the buildroot are libraries, pulled in via
dependencies.
@buildsys-build g
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:14:16PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Proper solution is actually minimazing content of the minimal build root
Most of the packages in the buildroot are libraries, pulled in via
dependencies.
@buildsys-build group is:
Mandatory packages : bash # basic shell env
V Thu, May 16, 2024 at 04:29:21AM -0600, Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 3:10 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 9:25 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've been trying to get 'add-determinism' deployed in buildroots. This
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:09:01AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> This looks like you're putting the resolver between a rock and a hard
> place. :thinking:
> I don't think I've ever seen packages being *removed* when installing
> BuildRequires on top of the minimal buildroot ...
>
> Would it be p
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 3:10 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 9:25 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been trying to get 'add-determinism' deployed in buildroots. This
> > has been unsuccessful because of the following issue.
> >
> > The dependen
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 9:25 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to get 'add-determinism' deployed in buildroots. This
> has been unsuccessful because of the following issue.
>
> The dependency chain is:
> redhat-rpm-config has
> Requires build-reproducibility-srpm
Hi,
I've been trying to get 'add-determinism' deployed in buildroots. This
has been unsuccessful because of the following issue.
The dependency chain is:
redhat-rpm-config has
Requires build-reproducibility-srpm-macros
and build-reproducibility-srpm-macros has
Requires:(add-determinism if
17 matches
Mail list logo
