On 13-04-20 06:12 PM, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 13-04-20 06:02 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 21 April 2013 10:56, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 13-04-20 05:48 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
[...]
I definitively agree that there's someone/a few people out there,
in this
strange self-imposed situation that a
On 13-04-20 06:02 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 21 April 2013 10:56, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 13-04-20 05:48 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
[...]
I definitively agree that there's someone/a few people out there, in this
strange self-imposed situation that are mentioned above, but I'd bet good
money i
On 21 April 2013 10:56, Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 13-04-20 05:48 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> I definitively agree that there's someone/a few people out there, in this
>>> strange self-imposed situation that are mentioned above, but I'd bet good
>>> money it's a such a small minority
On 13-04-20 05:48 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
[...]
I definitively agree that there's someone/a few people out there, in this
strange self-imposed situation that are mentioned above, but I'd bet good
money it's a such a small minority of Geany's users, possibly even less
than 1%, to be worth bending
[...]
> I definitively agree that there's someone/a few people out there, in this
> strange self-imposed situation that are mentioned above, but I'd bet good
> money it's a such a small minority of Geany's users, possibly even less
> than 1%, to be worth bending over backwards for.
>
The real pro
On 13-04-20 04:20 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
My experience based on my consulting customers is that they run old
versions or Red Hat mostly, with only security updates added. Even point
releases are viewed with suspicion, that is likely to mean they have to
hire me to re-compile their crusty old bus
On 21 April 2013 09:40, Harold Aling wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
> > And that is irrelevant, a more effective question is, what does Red Hat
> 6.0
> > have? (thats a real question, my quick look at their website couldn't
> > identify what it is)
>
> http://ftp.r
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
> And that is irrelevant, a more effective question is, what does Red Hat 6.0
> have? (thats a real question, my quick look at their website couldn't
> identify what it is)
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Client/en/os/SRPMS/
My experience based on my consulting customers is that they run old
versions or Red Hat mostly, with only security updates added. Even point
releases are viewed with suspicion, that is likely to mean they have to
hire me to re-compile their crusty old business apps to new libraries since
their own
On 13-04-20 09:52 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 20/04/2013 16:06, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 13-04-20 05:59 AM, Harold Aling wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
Agree with Thomas, we should go to 2.24 for windows since we supply the
bundle, Linux doesn't need to go so far,
On 20/04/2013 16:06, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 13-04-20 05:59 AM, Harold Aling wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
Agree with Thomas, we should go to 2.24 for windows since we supply the
bundle, Linux doesn't need to go so far, for eg what GTK did the
current red
hat and s
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 13-04-20 05:59 AM, Harold Aling wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
>>>
>>> Agree with Thomas, we should go to 2.24 for windows since we supply the
>>> bundle, Linux doesn't need to go so far, for eg what GTK
On 13-04-20 08:12 AM, Steven Blatnick wrote:
I can't speak for others, but...
I'm not sure what versions of GTK are considered bleeding edge,
The references to bleeding edge were about Geany, like latest release or
from Git, not bleeding edge GTK+3 (that's a whole other story [1]).
Cheers,
I can't speak for others, but...
I'm not sure what versions of GTK are considered bleeding edge, but I am on
linux Mint 11 (2011) since I am still upset with how Gnome3 has screwed linux
up and made it's UI regress substantially, but I digress...
Here is my version information if this is helpfu
On 13-04-20 05:59 AM, Harold Aling wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
Agree with Thomas, we should go to 2.24 for windows since we supply the
bundle, Linux doesn't need to go so far, for eg what GTK did the current red
hat and suse enterprise versions release with, expec
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
> Agree with Thomas, we should go to 2.24 for windows since we supply the
> bundle, Linux doesn't need to go so far, for eg what GTK did the current red
> hat and suse enterprise versions release with, expect 2.18 or 2.20.
I might be stepping co
16 matches
Mail list logo
