On 11 November 2013 20:31, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 13-11-10 11:18 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
Hi All,
Recently there have been a number of proposals for significant changes in
Geany, different languages, GObjectification and other various changes.
As good or bad as the
Am 11.11.2013 10:31, schrieb Matthew Brush:
5. Drop Scintilla and use GtkSourceView. I'll just enumerate the
reasons that come to mind, in no particular order:
* Scintilla is a big fat not-really-GTK+ C++ library
* We have to keep a fork up-to-date in our source tree
* It provides one of
On 13-11-11 02:42 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 11.11.2013 10:31, schrieb Matthew Brush:
[snip]
* GtkSourceView completely integrates into our GUI toolkit, using
native (not custom drawn like Scintilla) widgets inside and interacts
properly with stuff like scrolling, focus, DnD, key-bindings,
On 13-11-11 05:37 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 10.11.2013 21:04, schrieb Matthew Brush:
Maybe it's something specific to that Gist, so I re-pasted it in a new
one:
https://gist.github.com/codebrainz/7403171
Impressive. Unfortunately only a tiny fraction of Geany's code can be
vala'fied
Disclaimer: I know little to nothing about Vala.
I like how lean Geany is. From the discussion, it sounds like Vala does
its own memory management. Currently geany only uses between 9 and 13
MB of memory on my box. Would Vala inadvertantly make geany use more
memory? I don't want to use
One of the things I've enjoyed about switching from gedit to geany is
that geany typically doesn't use nearly as much memory and loads large
files easily. Now, I don't know if that's related to Scintilla vs
GtkSourceView, but really long documents, particularly with long lines,
freeze gedit
On 12 November 2013 03:38, Steven Blatnick steve8tr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Disclaimer: I know little to nothing about Vala.
I like how lean Geany is. From the discussion, it sounds like Vala does
its own memory management. Currently geany only uses between 9 and 13 MB
of memory on my box.
On 12 November 2013 02:45, Pavel Roschin ros...@scriptumplus.ru wrote:
5. Drop Scintilla and use GtkSourceView. I'll just enumerate the reasons
that come to mind, in no particular order:
But does this mean that some Sci-features are going to pass away? E.g.
scintilla
supports multiple
On 12 November 2013 03:51, Steven Blatnick steve8tr...@yahoo.com wrote:
One of the things I've enjoyed about switching from gedit to geany is
that geany typically doesn't use nearly as much memory and loads large
files easily. Now, I don't know if that's related to Scintilla vs
Hi All,
There have been lots of interesting suggestions so far. I will leave the
thread until the end of the week and then try to summarise.
So keep thinking.
So far nobody has said don't do anything so I guess that means that there
is general support for examining the design of Geany and
As a GNOME 3 user, I realy like the recent design of
the applications in GNOME, specify the GtkHeaderBar[1].
And yes, I know have some people not like the new design of
GNOME.
As Matthew say, we can to go use the modern GTK+ API,
for GtkApplication, GSettings and more, and I offer to go
also to
Am 12.11.2013 05:52, schrieb Steven Blatnick:
By the way, I should point out that these remarks also apply to the
geany direction thread. I also should point out this doesn't
necessarily mean I'm opposed to vala, I'm just expressing concerns.
From this thread, it sounds like vala binds
12 matches
Mail list logo
