Am 13.11.2013 01:21, schrieb Matthew Brush:
That's a fair[1] argument *if* those old distros aren't shipping GTK3
binaries/libraries (I can't say whether they are or not), otherwise
it's a bogus point because then we're only talking about a very very
small number of users who (all of these
[...]
How many Geany on Windows users are there? is it 90% POSIX/10%
Windows? Or more? Less?
I'm a big fan of the 90% rule. If 90% of the users don't need/want
it, don't implement or support it. Same goes for library versions: if
90%+ has GTK3, it's safe to require that.
Because Geany
[...]
I'm *really really really* tired of this topic. This comes up every now
and then, with the same bulled points over and over and with no outcome at
all (we're still at 2.16 after a couple of discussions even though nobody
explicitly says we need to be at this specific version).
Agree,
Am 13.11.2013 00:15, schrieb Lex Trotman:
This might be a MATE issue, I run both GTK2 and GTK3 in Mint Cinnamon
and havn't seen theme issues. (default Mint theme, I'm too lazy to
change it :) If by bookmarks you mean recently used then it
definitely updates from both, but how accurately and
Am 13.11.2013 00:48, schrieb Lex Trotman:
Because many distros are more than 3 years old and still supported.
Geany has users (and developers) in commercial and academic
environments which will often be constrained to older (but still
supported) versions of Red Hat, Scientific Linux, Suse
Am 13.11.2013 11:46, schrieb Lex Trotman:
Note, the windows nightly builder web page actually says its built
against 2.14.7, does anyone know if thats right?
At least some of the plugins will not.
Cheers,
Frank
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 13.11.2013 11:30, schrieb Lex Trotman:
Because Geany does not install spyware to see where it is used, we
really don't know. :)
Well... we got the updatecheckerplugin ... but there is and will no data
collection.
Cheers,
Frank
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 13.11.2013 11:30, schrieb Lex Trotman:
I was thinking of asking on the users ML, after we agreed the questions
here first. But do we want to?
Are we looking for market share? Or are we interested in making the
best software that suits the contributors, and if its useful to others fine?
בתאריך ד', נוב 13, 2013 בשעה 12:46 PM, Lex Trotman
ele...@gmail.com כתב:
[...]
I'm *really really really* tired of this topic. This comes up every
now and then, with the same bulled points over and over and with no
outcome at all (we're still at 2.16 after a couple of discussions
even
Wow, you found the article :-)
From what I've seen of geany, the code looks much better than some code
I've seen. It didn't take as long to familiarize myself with the basic
structure since the code files are well named and the directory
structure is far from deep ;-) One of the reasons I
On 13-11-13 08:21 AM, Steven Blatnick wrote:
Wow, you found the article :-)
From what I've seen of geany, the code looks much better than some code
I've seen. It didn't take as long to familiarize myself with the basic
structure since the code files are well named and the directory
structure
Hi,
I made a PR: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/189
It's not a big deal, but might come handy for some. What do you think?
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.geany.org
https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
12 matches
Mail list logo
