On 24/05/15 18:54, Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 19/04/2015 17:31, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
>> […]
>>
>> I'll open an issue on Scintilla and see what Neil thinks, whether he'd
>> accept a hack like that dummy field -- or maybe if he has a better
>> understanding of ABI issues on Windows (but I'm
Le 19/04/2015 17:31, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
> […]
>
> I'll open an issue on Scintilla and see what Neil thinks, whether he'd
> accept a hack like that dummy field -- or maybe if he has a better
> understanding of ABI issues on Windows (but I'm afraid here there really
> is an ABI incompatibil
On 20 April 2015 at 07:58, Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On 19/04/15 23:46, Lex Trotman wrote:
>> On 20 April 2015 at 07:43, Enrico Tröger wrote:
>>> On 19/04/15 17:39, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 19.04.2015 um 15:57 schrieb Enrico Tröger:
> This said, the reason we need the hack is because of
>>>
On 19/04/15 23:46, Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 20 April 2015 at 07:43, Enrico Tröger wrote:
>> On 19/04/15 17:39, Thomas Martitz wrote:
>>> Am 19.04.2015 um 15:57 schrieb Enrico Tröger:
This said, the reason we need the hack is because of
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712220, so
On 20 April 2015 at 07:43, Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On 19/04/15 17:39, Thomas Martitz wrote:
>> Am 19.04.2015 um 15:57 schrieb Enrico Tröger:
>>> This said, the reason we need the hack is because of
>>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712220, so if this was fixed
>>> we could one day drop
On 19/04/15 17:39, Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Am 19.04.2015 um 15:57 schrieb Enrico Tröger:
>> This said, the reason we need the hack is because of
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712220, so if this was fixed
>> we could one day drop the hack. But this would mean depend on a fixed
>> ve
Am 19.04.2015 um 15:57 schrieb Enrico Tröger:
This said, the reason we need the hack is because of
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712220, so if this was fixed
we could one day drop the hack. But this would mean depend on a fixed
version, which probably won't be acceptable before a de
Le 19/04/2015 15:57, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
> On 17/04/15 19:44, Colomban Wendling wrote:
>> Le 15/04/2015 15:27, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
>> […]
>>
>> So we'll have to fix the Windows build issue in some way…
>
> I gave it another look, however I sort of give up :(.
>
> What I know is, with
On 17/04/15 19:44, Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 15/04/2015 15:27, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
>> […]
>>
>> BTW, I think I found a way to avoid the oversize without subclassing
>> GtkScrolledWindow, which might even be a better fix for the original issue.
>
> Okay, the idea was setting the style p
Le 15/04/2015 15:27, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
> […]
>
> BTW, I think I found a way to avoid the oversize without subclassing
> GtkScrolledWindow, which might even be a better fix for the original issue.
Okay, the idea was setting the style property
`GtkScrollbar::min-slider-length` to somethin
On 15/04/15 23:14, Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 15/04/2015 22:38, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
>>
>> I just noticed this in the debug messages:
>>
>>> GLib-GObject WARNING: specified instance size for type
>>> `SmallScroller' is smaller than the parent type's `GtkScrolledWindow'
>>> insta
Le 15/04/2015 22:38, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
>
> I just noticed this in the debug messages:
>
>> GLib-GObject WARNING : specified instance size for type `SmallScroller' is
>> smaller than the parent type's `GtkScrolledWindow' instance size
>> GLib CRITICAL: g_once_init_leave: assertio
Le 14/04/2015 21:54, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
>
> Windows 7 with GTK 2.24.10.
> Nick has the same problem, we talked about this in
> http://lists.geany.org/devel/2015-January/009257.html.
I just tested with GTK 2.24.10 on Windows 7, and it does fail the same.
I also tried with GTK 3.6.4 (!) and t
Hi,
Le 14/04/2015 21:54, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
> […]
>
> Windows 7 with GTK 2.24.10.
> Nick has the same problem, we talked about this in
> http://lists.geany.org/devel/2015-January/009257.html.
Dammit, I knew I saw this recently on a thread, but apparently I can't
search my emails :) thanks
On 15 April 2015 at 05:54, Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On 14/04/15 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
>> On 14.4.2015 г. 02:00, Lex Trotman wrote:
>>> On 14 April 2015 at 07:32, Colomban
>>> Wendling wrote:
Hi everyone,
I don't use my Windows VM very often, but I realized today that the
On 14/04/15 21:54, Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On 14/04/15 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
>> On 14.4.2015 г. 02:00, Lex Trotman wrote:
>>> On 14 April 2015 at 07:32, Colomban
>>> Wendling wrote:
Hi everyone,
I don't use my Windows VM very often, but I realized today that the
completio
On 14/04/15 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On 14.4.2015 г. 02:00, Lex Trotman wrote:
>> On 14 April 2015 at 07:32, Colomban
>> Wendling wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I don't use my Windows VM very often, but I realized today that the
>>> completion popups were broken there during the 1.25 cycle
On 14.4.2015 г. 02:00, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 14 April 2015 at 07:32, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Hi everyone,
I don't use my Windows VM very often, but I realized today that the
completion popups were broken there during the 1.25 cycle [1].
Could everyone using a development version of Geany und
On 14 April 2015 at 07:32, Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I don't use my Windows VM very often, but I realized today that the
> completion popups were broken there during the 1.25 cycle [1].
>
> Could everyone using a development version of Geany under Windows tell
> me whether it wor
Hi everyone,
I don't use my Windows VM very often, but I realized today that the
completion popups were broken there during the 1.25 cycle [1].
Could everyone using a development version of Geany under Windows tell
me whether it works for them or not, and their Windows and GTK versions?
I myself
20 matches
Mail list logo
