Am So, 6.10.2013, 15:39 schrieb Thomas Martitz:
>
>
> Lex Trotman schrieb:
>>On 6 October 2013 22:21, Thomas Martitz <
>>thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 03.10.2013 02:00, schrieb Lex Trotman:
>>>
>>>
Is there a problem with this approach?
That means w
Lex Trotman schrieb:
>On 6 October 2013 22:21, Thomas Martitz <
>thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de> wrote:
>
>> Am 03.10.2013 02:00, schrieb Lex Trotman:
>>
>>
>>> Is there a problem with this approach?
>>>
>>>
>>> That means when the minimum version of GTK is increased we will have
>to
>
On 6 October 2013 22:21, Thomas Martitz <
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de> wrote:
> Am 03.10.2013 02:00, schrieb Lex Trotman:
>
>
>> Is there a problem with this approach?
>>
>>
>> That means when the minimum version of GTK is increased we will have to
>> upgrade to version of Glade that
Am 03.10.2013 02:00, schrieb Lex Trotman:
Is there a problem with this approach?
That means when the minimum version of GTK is increased we will have
to upgrade to version of Glade that supports the new widgets that come
with the new GTK. And then apply the fixes. So along with lack of
> Is there a problem with this approach?
>
That means when the minimum version of GTK is increased we will have to
upgrade to version of Glade that supports the new widgets that come with
the new GTK. And then apply the fixes. So along with lack of windows
maintenance (please lets deprecate it)
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 17:01:09 +0200
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> To sum the problem up:
> - As long as we're still on GTK+ 2.x we won't be able to use upstream
> Glade (Geany on GTK+3 is fine, btw, thanks for that work).
> - Worse, only a few older versions work.
This would have been a problem if
Am 12.09.2013 02:38, schrieb Matthew Brush:
Hi,
I (as a unregular contributor) would love to be able to use glade.
To sum the problem up:
- As long as we're still on GTK+ 2.x we won't be able to use upstream
Glade (Geany on GTK+3 is fine, btw, thanks for that work).
- Worse, only a few old
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:38:58 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> P.S. Are we all still agreed to using old 3.8.1 version of Glade?
After 2.x, I'm using Glade only to generate object templates in a test
file, and edit the real glade files with Geany. It's much easier.
> Thoughts?
3.6.7 does not genera
On 18/09/2013 21:36, Matthew Brush wrote:
P.S. Are we all still agreed to using old 3.8.1 version of Glade? I
think this idea of using same version sounds good, at least we won't be
causing additional noise in diffs due to different versions writing
stuff out in different ways.
One might hope s
On 13-09-18 09:07 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 12/09/2013 01:38, Matthew Brush wrote:
P.S. Are we all still agreed to using old 3.8.1 version of Glade? I
think this idea of using same version sounds good, at least we won't be
causing additional noise in diffs due to different versions writing
st
On 12/09/2013 01:38, Matthew Brush wrote:
P.S. Are we all still agreed to using old 3.8.1 version of Glade? I
think this idea of using same version sounds good, at least we won't be
causing additional noise in diffs due to different versions writing
stuff out in different ways.
One might hope s
On 18/09/2013 17:07, Nick Treleaven wrote:
I've just seen 3.14.2 is available for windows though.
Although that isn't compatible with gtk+ 2.x apps.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.geany.org
https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I would like to propose that we have a policy where any commits that
touches the Glade file, must either contain the file's contents after
saving it through the Glade's UI or include a commit that follows it
with the noisy diff produced by Glade. The problem is, we all keep
hand-editing t
13 matches
Mail list logo
