Hello,
we need to enable security in the Update.1 images, since the plan is
to ship with it enabled. Looks like it's turned off in pilgrim at the
moment.
463 echo - turning off security by default
464 rm -f $INSTALL_ROOT/etc/olpc-security
Dennis, we are planning to request approval for a
On 12/14/07 23:30, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
We're planning to rebase on Fedora 8 for Update 2, but it's good to
be able to preview these ahead of time.
Has this been proposed somewhere? I don't think I agree with it.
I don't disagree strongly, but just enough that I'll stop someone
The location of the Update.1 builds has changed:
http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/olpc/streams/update.1/
I'm not sure if it's the final location but it would be to update the
Changelog to point to it.
http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/update.1-pkgs.html
Marco
On Dec 15, 2007 7:41 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The location of the Update.1 builds has changed:
http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/olpc/streams/update.1/
I'm not sure if it's the final location but it would be to update the
Changelog to point to it.
On Dec 15, 2007 3:14 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 7:35 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 11:01 PM, Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Declaring code freeze for Update.1 today would not see a rational
resolution of these
On Dec 15, 2007 3:54 PM, Bernardo Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
My personal feeling is that we created update.1 too soon. IMO
development should have been occurring in the joyride builds up until
code freeze (yesterday, or a week from yesterday). There's no
Scott,
The Roadmap lists activity isolation as a release criterion for
Update.1. Was there a public announcement that I missed explaining why
activity isolation was ever turned off?
Thanks,
Michael
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 12:31:43PM +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Hello,
we need to
On Dec 15, 2007 10:26 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 3:54 PM, Bernardo Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moreover, I was very confused by the fact that we branched Update.1
from Ship.2 rather than from Joyride, which I still considered our
development
Yes. We need to discuss this in detail. Let's get over the Update.1
hurdle and regroup, hopefully with better mechanisms for discussion
and vetting.
-walter
On Dec 15, 2007 7:46 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 1:12 PM, Bernardo Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I've attempted to remove the ship.2-specific patches from pilgrim's
update.1 branch and synchronize it with joyride. That should
enable security, but it looks like ohm might not be started until
cjb addresses trac #5509 (see also trac #5510 and 5511).
#5509's been done since
Hi all,
I am thinking about using 9 different icons for the PlayGo Activity.
The icon will reflect the number of handicap stones that the black
player starts with.
The icon will have from 1 to 9 black dots on the board star points.
This could be used to offer people games in the neighborhood
On Dec 15, 2007 5:27 PM, Bernardo Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've started building my own images a few weeks ago and found
that it is not at all difficult. All I had to do was really
cloning the pilgrim repo and changing the build name from
joyride to xtest. A build generally takes 10
1. Kuala Lumpur: Matt Keller attended the Global Knowledge Conference
this past week; the conference brought together over 2000 people from
around the world. Matt was part of a BBC World debate on technology
and the developing world generally, and the XO specifically. While
most of the panelists
On Dec 15, 2007 10:38 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 4:36 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Roadmap lists activity isolation as a release criterion for
Update.1. Was there a public announcement that I missed explaining why
activity isolation
but unfortunately have not got feedback, and I suspect one of the reasons is
that it is too difficult to boot UBIFS on XO.
I think you would be well served by making it clearer to people what
the goals are of UBIFS relative to existing systems, such as JFFS2, on
the XO. This may motivate more
On Dec 15, 2007 11:52 AM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott has written very detailed instructions on how to do this but his
documentation is currently located on the internalwiki in pursuit of, in
my view, security by obscurity. Since I am not maintaining these
servers, I do not
... and in a similar vein:
http://cfrey.us/~erikb/ODDPC/
On 12/15/07, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 1:14 AM, Ivan Krstić [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://live.laptop.org/~krstic/lolpc.jpg
It had to be done.
One Laptop Per Cat!
--scott
--
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1430/
-WikiBrowse-8.xo
+WikiBrowse-9.xo
-iptables.i386 0:1.3.8-2.1.fc7
+iptables.i386 0:1.3.8-6.fc7
-iptables-ipv6.i386 0:1.3.8-2.1.fc7
+iptables-ipv6.i386 0:1.3.8-6.fc7
-libshout.i386 0:2.2.2-1.fc6
+libshout.i386 0:2.2.2-2.fc7
-pam.i386
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1431/
-Journal-80.xo
+Journal-81.xo
-Web-79.xo
+Web-80.xo
--- Journal-81 ---
* Allow use of gamekeys and home/end, #3960 (rwh)
* Focus does not escape from listview, #3771 (rwh)
* Change resume icon color, #4326 (rwh)
*
Thanks, comments are inline.
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:46:03 +0100
Bernardo Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
SPECS/olpc-2.6.spec |8 +++-
buildd.sh |2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/SPECS/olpc-2.6.spec b/SPECS/olpc-2.6.spec
Andres Salomon wrote:
There's no need to attempt to maintain any sort of compatibility with
the fedora kernel spec file. Rather than unsetting variables and keeping
tons of crap in the .spec file, I'd just as soon rip out anything that's
related to _enable_debug_packages.
YES! Please!
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Care to put quick instructions on the wiki? This is something I wanted
to do several times, but never felt to invest the time to learn how.
Done: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Building_custom_images
As usual, my questionable English needs some fixing, and I couldn't
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
Almost the final location. As documented in trac bug #5279,
ultimately all builds will be transferred to download.laptop.org after
passing an automated test. So pilgrim is the 'final location' until
we get the automated test infrastructure running, then everything
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1432/
-cpio.i386 0:2.6-28.fc7
-dmraid.i386 0:1.0.0.rc14-4.fc7
-findutils.i386 1:4.2.29-2
-gzip.i386 0:1.3.11-2.fc7
-kernel.i586 0:2.6.22-20071213.7.olpc.807beb7d0b8a49a
+kernel.i586 0:2.6.22-20071215.21.olpc.6fce16b65e15831
-kpartx.i386
24 matches
Mail list logo
