On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Build Announcer Script wrote:
> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1452/
>
> -Chat-31.xo
> +Chat-32.xo
> +libpcap.i386 14:0.9.7-1.fc7
> -olpc-utils.i386 0:0.53-1.olpc2
> +olpc-utils.i386 0:0.59-1.olpc2
> +sudo.i386 0:1.6.8p12-14.fc7
> +tcpdump.i386 14:3
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1452/
-Chat-31.xo
+Chat-32.xo
+libpcap.i386 14:0.9.7-1.fc7
-olpc-utils.i386 0:0.53-1.olpc2
+olpc-utils.i386 0:0.59-1.olpc2
+sudo.i386 0:1.6.8p12-14.fc7
+tcpdump.i386 14:3.9.7-1.fc7
--- Chat-32 ---
* Pippy-ize Chat, so that 'view source'
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1451/
-Read-36.xo
+Read-37.xo
-olpcupdate.i386 0:1.9-0
+olpcupdate.i386 0:2.0-0
-sugar.i386 0:0.75.4-1
+sugar.i386 0:0.75.5-1
--- Read-37 ---
* Fix sharing issue, #5365
--
This email was automatically generated
Aggregated logs at ht
On Dec 20, 2007 1:05 AM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 4:00 PM, Build Announcer Script <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1450/
> > --- Journal-82 ---
> > * #2545 Correctly unmount the device from the DS when
On Dec 19, 2007 4:00 PM, Build Announcer Script <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1450/
> --- Journal-82 ---
> * #2545 Correctly unmount the device from the DS when it is removed.
> (tomeu)
> * Implement ShowObject, #4909 (rwh)
>
> ---
*IPv4
On 12/19/07, ffm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > > On a simmilar vein, would it be much of a perfomance hit to be running
> > > denyhosts on these machines?
> >
> > What would it do with the mesh network interface?
>
>
> IIRC
On 12/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > On a simmilar vein, would it be much of a perfomance hit to be running
> > denyhosts on these machines?
>
> What would it do with the mesh network interface?
IIRC, each member of the mesh is assigned an IPv6 IP address in the reser
> On a simmilar vein, would it be much of a perfomance hit to be running
> denyhosts on these machines?
What would it do with the mesh network interface?
--e
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
yes, having a root password is generaly bad, as it is what most attackers
will try first.
On a simmilar vein, would it be much of a perfomance hit to be running
denyhosts on these machines?
-ffm
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1450/
-Journal-81.xo
+Journal-82.xo
-Web-80.xo
+Web-81.xo
-sugar-datastore.noarch 0:0.7.1-1
+sugar-datastore.noarch 0:0.7.2-1
--- Journal-82 ---
* #2545 Correctly unmount the device from the DS when it is removed. (tomeu)
* Implem
On Dec 19, 2007, at 1:50 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Yeah ... sudo is more secure than su. In fact, some systems, for
> example, the Gentoo LiveCD, scrambles the root password. So you
> have to do
>
> $ sudo su -
>
> and then set a password to ssh in as root.
+1
This is the same thing a
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1449/
-Calculate-14.xo
+Calculate-15.xo
--- Calculate-15 ---
* Fixed parsing of fraction separators, #5319
--
This email was automatically generated
Aggregated logs at http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/joyride-pkgs.html
_
Thanks for the feedback, Adam.
--
dwmw2
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 13:22 -0500, David Woodhouse wrote:
> If we should design a next generation of DCON chip, are there any
> improvements we should make to it?
>
> Adam, do I recall correctly that you had problems hooking it up to X for
> idle detection? Anything we could do to make that better
http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/olpc/streams/update.1/build665/
-nspr.i386 0:4.6.7-0.7.1.fc7
-nss.i386 0:3.11.7-0.7.2.fc7
-xulrunner.i386 0:1.9-0.10.a9pre.olpc2
+xulrunner.i386 0:1.9-0.beta1.7.olpc2
--
This email was automatically generated
Aggregated logs at http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/upda
http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/olpc/streams/update.1/build664/
+nspr.i386 0:4.6.7-0.7.1.fc7
+nss.i386 0:3.11.7-0.7.2.fc7
-sugar.i386 0:0.75.1-1
+sugar.i386 0:0.75.4-1
+xulrunner.i386 0:1.9-0.10.a9pre.olpc2
-xulrunner.i386 0:1.9-0.beta1.7.olpc2
--
This email was automatically generated
Aggre
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 11:09 -0500, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 5:57 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > there is some disagreement in trac about how bugs triaging should
> > work. See for example:
> >
> > http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/5538#comment:5
> >
> > My under
On Dec 19, 2007 5:57 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there is some disagreement in trac about how bugs triaging should
> work. See for example:
>
> http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/5538#comment:5
>
> My understanding is that developers and testers can propose tickets
> using the U
On 18/12/07 22:54 -0800, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Jordan Crouse wrote:
>> On 18/12/07 12:39 -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> However, you appear to be correct about the oprofile kernel.
>>>
>>>> $ grep OPROFILE config*
>>>> config-olpc-generic:# CONFIG_OPROFILE is not se
Reinier Heeres wrote:
> Jani,
>
> That would be awesome, and in fact we were hoping that something like
> this was possible. I made only minor adjustments to the latest source.
> The biggest changes are in configure.ac and Makefile.am: there are new
> options --disable-binary and --enable-embed
We need to submit patches upstream at some point after Update.1.
Marco
On Dec 19, 2007 3:44 PM, Reinier Heeres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jani,
>
> That would be awesome, and in fact we were hoping that something like
> this was possible. I made only minor adjustments to the latest source.
> Th
Jani,
That would be awesome, and in fact we were hoping that something like
this was possible. I made only minor adjustments to the latest source.
The biggest changes are in configure.ac and Makefile.am: there are new
options --disable-binary and --enable-embed to just build things
relevant fo
On Dec 19, 2007, at 7:12 AM, Ed Montgomery wrote:
> Otherwise, you are wasting bandwidth on this list. I don't speak for
> anyone other than myself, of course, but I am not
> remotely interested in anything that is NOT open
> source. Perhaps you could start a closed source list
> of some sort to
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:27:54 -0500
From: John Richard Moser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Oprofile, swap
To: Ivan Krsti? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
(Note: most of this message isn't very us
On Dec 18, 2007 3:54 PM, Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Jameson Chema Quinn wrote:
> > Has anyone looked at Psyco on the XO?
>
>
> Psyco improves performance at the cost of memory. On a memory-
> constrained machine, it's a tradeoff that can only be made in
Hello,
there is some disagreement in trac about how bugs triaging should
work. See for example:
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/5538#comment:5
My understanding is that developers and testers can propose tickets
using the Update.1? keyword but it's up to Jim and Kim to actually
triage the ticket to
Reinier Heeres wrote:
> Jani,
>
> Which upstream are you referring to? The newer evince version is already
I was referring to the GNOME svn upstream, and whether plain evince
tarballs will be usable for wrapping in sugar if built with certain
configure options. I'd like to reuse as many of the
Jani,
Which upstream are you referring to? The newer evince version is already
in joyride, and Read is updated there to use it. When it's nicely tested
there it will probably go in the update.1 build.
The Read modifications necessary (a few lines) to work with the newer
evince are already in gi
Reinier Heeres wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Pushed the patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Reinier
Hi Reinier,
are the Sugar changes suitable for upstream inclusion?
thanks
Jani
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Thanks!
Pushed the patch.
Cheers,
Reinier
Dan Krejsa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just got an error
>
> sugar-jhbuild update: dependent module "evince-olpc" not found
>
> from ./sugar-jhbuild.
>
> The following change seems to fix it:
>
> $ git diff
> diff --git a/build-scripts/sugar-platform.modules
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
