On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Richard A. Smith wrote:
>
> If you wanted to help and you have a 1.5 you can. People with 1.5s can
> provide accurate usage info they install the latest release, make sure the
> date is set correctly, and then allow powerd to do ASR (ie don't disable
> it). Then u
I haven't seen it pushed, please do. My test was with a dirty kernel.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On 11/29/2011 05:11 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
How's the battery life on the 1.75 going for Read, web browsing&
suspend? (3 of the most important functions) Anyone doing tests on
these yet?
I have begun doing battery life testing. But aggressive suspend/resume
is not 100% functional yet (but
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Firmware_q4c07
this is primarily an EC release. it has numerous battery system
changes, and it introduces support for preserving the keystroke which
causes a system resume,
keystroke preservation requires a hardware mod on c1 machines. in
principle it should work
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Frederick Grose wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:55 AM, S Page wrote:
>
>> >> Sorry to butt in What is the recommended way to identify the
>> >> type/model of keyboard/trackpad?
>> >
>> > Good question. This should be put on a Wiki page.
>>
>> http://wi
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:55 AM, S Page wrote:
> >> Sorry to butt in What is the recommended way to identify the
> >> type/model of keyboard/trackpad?
> >
> > Good question. This should be put on a Wiki page.
>
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Support_FAQ/Mouse,_Touchpad ?
>
> --
> =S Page
Thanks for looking at this. I thought I was seeing this error message continue
to scroll by...
Cheers,
was
On Dec 2, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Saadia Husain Baloch wrote:
> Sasha and James,
> I thought this was pushed to arm-3.0-wip, but it doesn't show up there. After
> trying it out, I found t
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
wrote:
> My understanding is the Sugar's ad-hoc automatically defaults to
> channel 1. Would it be possible for the client (XO or otherwise) to
> automatically pick the best channel (1, 6 or 11) based on prevailing
> interference levels?
For the
Sasha and James,
I thought this was pushed to arm-3.0-wip, but it doesn't show up there.
After trying it out, I found that the board revision was not current, and
got that fixed by jnettlet.
Any clues as to whether the patch was pushed?
-Saadia
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:00 AM, James Cameron wrot
