] [mailto:sugar-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mikus Grinbergs
>> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 6:19 PM
>> To: devel@lists.laptop.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [sugar] specifying what services Activities may use
>>
>> There was an earlier discussion of
Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Maybe what I'm suggesting boils down to integrate this core activities
>> in the environment so that people installing Sugar won't have to install
>> them separatly. Just the same way that installing a standard Fedora
>> will install Gnome (will instal
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 08:21:34PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:40:39AM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> >> It's not that important anyway. It just occurred to me that the
> >> dependancies management challenge could be somehow dealt wi
Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:40:39AM +0200, Bastien wrote:
>> It's not that important anyway. It just occurred to me that the
>> dependancies management challenge could be somehow dealt with by
>> delivering a set of default activities. I'm not aware of
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:40:39AM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> It's not that important anyway. It just occurred to me that the
> dependancies management challenge could be somehow dealt with by
> delivering a set of default activities. I'm not aware of any
> software distribution drawing such a stro
"Bobby Powers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> recent joyrides include an activity updater which should help with this.
>
>> And you guys could get rid of the scary red warning on the wiki :)
>
> on which page?
See the barking here:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Update.1_Software_Release_Notes
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 17:09 -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> > Please ensure that you have filed tickets for each and every one of them
>
> What good will that do?
We track issues through trac. Doing it through email is harder when you
have a lot of email and a lot of issues.
Filing a ticket keyw
Hi Mikus,
On 29 Jul 2008, at 22:09, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
>> Please ensure that you have filed tickets for each and every one of
>> them
>
> What good will that do?
>
> At the beginning of this year, I wrote a ticket saying an Activity
> would not start. Without notifying me, someone re-assig
> Please ensure that you have filed tickets for each and every one of them
What good will that do?
At the beginning of this year, I wrote a ticket saying an Activity
would not start. Without notifying me, someone re-assigned *me* as
the owner of that ticket -- presumably making it my responsib
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 15:10 -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> A DECISION NEEDS TO BE MADE !!!
>
> I've been randomly launching Activities on 2226. __Far too many__
> of them fail -- because csound was changed, numeric was changed,
> mixer was changed, etc., etc., etc.
Please ensure that you have
> -Original Message-
> From: Benjamin M. Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 7:40 PM
> To: Jerry Williams
> Cc: 'Mikus Grinbergs'; devel@lists.laptop.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [sugar] specifying what services Activities
vel@lists.laptop.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [sugar] specifying what services Activities may use
>
> There was an earlier discussion of how to provide the right build
> level for users out in the field, since now Builds can be installed
> separately from Activities -- leading to
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jerry Williams wrote:
> | Seems like this problem for linux was solved with RPM.
> | With rpm if something is missing for something you want to install, it
> | complains and won't let you install it.
>
> That's not r
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Benjamin M. Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Jerry Williams wrote:
>> | Seems like this problem for linux was solved with RPM.
>> | With rpm if something is missing for something you want to install, it
>> | complains
"Benjamin M. Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jerry Williams wrote:
> | Seems like this problem for linux was solved with RPM.
> | With rpm if something is missing for something you want to install, it
> | complains and won't let you install it.
>
> That's not really the problem we're discu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jerry Williams wrote:
| Seems like this problem for linux was solved with RPM.
| With rpm if something is missing for something you want to install, it
| complains and won't let you install it.
That's not really the problem we're discussing. We're ta
16 matches
Mail list logo
