Re: [sugar] Autosave in 8.2.0?

2008-07-21 Thread Bert Freudenberg
Am 20.07.2008 um 08:59 schrieb Marco Pesenti Gritti: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: >> Thanks for not answering, > > Hmm? Both Tomeu and me answered. > > http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-July/016914.html > http://lists.laptop.org/pip

Re: [sugar] Autosave in 8.2.0?

2008-07-21 Thread Bert Freudenberg
Am 20.07.2008 um 12:27 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: >> Am 17.07.2008 um 07:37 schrieb Bert Freudenberg: >> >>> Am 17.07.2008 um 00:10 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso: >>> Marco has added a session manager to Sugar (in 8.2.0) th

Re: [sugar] Autosave in 8.2.0?

2008-07-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am 17.07.2008 um 07:37 schrieb Bert Freudenberg: > >> Am 17.07.2008 um 00:10 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso: >> >>> Marco has added a session manager to Sugar (in 8.2.0) that takes care >>> of telling activities to save their work

Re: [sugar] Autosave in 8.2.0?

2008-07-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for not answering, Hmm? Both Tomeu and me answered. http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-July/016914.html http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-July/016951.html > and not updating the API doc, T

Re: Autosave in 8.2.0?

2008-07-20 Thread Bert Freudenberg
Am 17.07.2008 um 07:37 schrieb Bert Freudenberg: > Am 17.07.2008 um 00:10 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso: > >> Marco has added a session manager to Sugar (in 8.2.0) that takes care >> of telling activities to save their work because the system is being >> shut down. Haven't verified if this is complete and

Re: Autosave in 8.2.0?

2008-07-19 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > I think that Freedesktop people are moving to a D-Bus based protocol, > but don't the status of it. > It's actually just GNOME for now... but I'm keeping an eye on it and will add support for that protocol as soon as it's agreed/implemented. Marco __

Re: Autosave in 8.2.0?

2008-07-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am 17.07.2008 um 00:10 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso: > >> Marco has added a session manager to Sugar (in 8.2.0) that takes care >> of telling activities to save their work because the system is being >> shut down. Haven't verifi

Re: Autosave in 8.2.0?

2008-07-17 Thread Bert Freudenberg
Am 17.07.2008 um 00:10 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso: > Marco has added a session manager to Sugar (in 8.2.0) that takes care > of telling activities to save their work because the system is being > shut down. Haven't verified if this is complete and working. Have you, > Marco? If so, this would also take

Re: Autosave in 8.2.0?

2008-07-17 Thread Morgan Collett
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 09:10, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I heard we may have implemented some interim saving feature since

Re: Autosave in 8.2.0?

2008-07-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I heard we may have implemented some interim saving feature since 656. >> Does anyone know anything about that? > > Not sure what that refers

Re: Autosave in 8.2.0?

2008-07-16 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a priority request from "the field" to not lose any saved data. > > I believe we already do that except in the case of a "crash" or "freeze" > of activities (no crashes is another request :-). Is that right?

Autosave in 8.2.0?

2008-07-16 Thread Greg Smith
Hi All, I have a priority request from "the field" to not lose any saved data. I believe we already do that except in the case of a "crash" or "freeze" of activities (no crashes is another request :-). Is that right? I heard we may have implemented some interim saving feature since 656. Does a