Hi Marco,
Reading the "Blocks?" bugs this morning: http://dev.laptop.org/report/29
I noticed that we can get a lot of them off the list if we can close or
defer 8090.
Where are we with activity launching? Is it good enough and we have the
main issues ironed out?
I see mention of "Eben's" patc
It's not really an issue of speed. The launcher in current joyrides
has a half-dozen serious behavioral bugs. I worked with Marco to
create a patch for this, which cleans up all but one tiny behavioral
glitch, and which after 3+ days of testing by myself and a few others
has yielded no side effec
Sorry, to clarify: I think we should remove blocks?:8.2.0 from #8090,
since we clearly aren't going to fix all those bugs. However, we
should add it to #7669, which has a patch awaiting review, since that
ticket solves 5 others if the patch is accepted.
- Eben
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:52 AM,
;Eben Eliason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Blocks? and bug 8090
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sorry, to clarify: I think we should remove blocks?:8.2.0 from #8090,
since w
Hi Eben,
On 27 Aug 2008, at 15:52, Eben Eliason wrote:
> It's not really an issue of speed. The launcher in current joyrides
> has a half-dozen serious behavioral bugs. I worked with Marco to
> create a patch for this, which cleans up all but one tiny behavioral
> glitch, and which after 3+ day
Gary -
I'm not sure about the issue. I asked Marco about it, and he said he
doesn't think that my patch is responsible. If you're certain that it
only occurs with my patch, then you should probably ping Marco
directly about it, because I don't know the details of the window
system well enough.
cks-.
>
> 7669 is not marked blocks right now but I believe the code can go in if
> it is ready. Please get that added ASAP so it makes the next build.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Greg S
>
> **
>
> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:54:41 -0400
> From: "
Greg Smith wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> Reading the "Blocks?" bugs this morning: http://dev.laptop.org/report/29
>
> I noticed that we can get a lot of them off the list if we can close
> or defer 8090.
>
> Where are we with activity launching? Is it good enough and we have
> the main issues ironed out
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Eben,
>
> On 27 Aug 2008, at 15:52, Eben Eliason wrote:
>
>> It's not really an issue of speed. The launcher in current joyrides
>> has a half-dozen serious behavioral bugs. I worked with Marco to
>> create a patch for