On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:51, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:03 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>>> Agreed. You can do what you are doing (run a school on newish sw, get
>>> a tight feedback & bugfix loop) when someone lik
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:51, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:03 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> Agreed. You can do what you are doing (run a school on newish sw, get
>> a tight feedback & bugfix loop) when someone like you is there.
> [...]
>> Yes -- but we gotta remember tha
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:03 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Agreed. You can do what you are doing (run a school on newish sw, get
> a tight feedback & bugfix loop) when someone like you is there.
[...]
> Yes -- but we gotta remember that it's productive (specially for
> Sugar) because you are ther
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> So no XS in place?
>
> The repair lab is not nearby any of the schools.
Ah - ok. Thanks for clarifying.
>> Downstreams that go to deployment (OLPC!) want to wait until a release
>> is reasonably well tested and stabilised.
>
> We have a
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 10:46 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > Me too, but it's not as bad as it seems: the techies use a simple shell
> > script to backup and restore the journal (and scratch data) across
>
> So no XS in place?
The repai
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Me too, but it's not as bad as it seems: the techies use a simple shell
> script to backup and restore the journal (and scratch data) across
So no XS in place?
>> It feels uncomfortable that Sugar 0.84 is already a year old effort
>> as
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 20:50 +, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Agreed, though this argument only really works if the changes
> each time are easy to install from the user perspective with
> no loss of data. I wish we were doing much better here.
Me too, but it's not as bad as it seems: the techies use
On 13 Mar 2010, at 18:12, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 12:07 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti
>> wrote:
>>> If you ask me: our recent F11-XO1 builds have reached equal or better
>>> quality than build 801, provided you disable
