On Jul 1, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Kim Quirk wrote:
> My thoughts in-line...
> Kim
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:16 PM, C. Scott Ananian
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Greg Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - Kim will check with Peru and Greg will check with Urug
Hi Scott,
Good catch. We did talk about the question of marking bugs. Sorry I
missed that in my notes.
I think it was agreed that we talk about those in the weekly software
status meeting. Also, that bugs which are considered blockers should
have the keyword: blocks:8.2.0
This is documented a
My thoughts in-line...
Kim
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:16 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > - Kim will check with Peru and Greg will check with Uruguay teams to
> > ensure that they do not plan to upgrade to
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Kim will check with Peru and Greg will check with Uruguay teams to
> ensure that they do not plan to upgrade to 8.2.0. Action item due by
> July 20.
Why don't we want them to use 8.2?
I suspect some words were left out, and
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We talked about what this page offers that we don't already have. The
> conclusion was that its a high level view of the main features in the
> release. Each item on this page should include a list of relevant bug id
> that giv
Hi All,
Marco, Greg, Kim, Joe, Paul, Eben, Chris, Scott, Jim, Denis, Michael and
others people met on Tuesday July 1 at 2PM US ET via IRC, phone and in
person.
Sorry for the long e-mail but it was a very productive meeting and I
want to keep everyone in the loop.
Agenda is at: http://lists.la
