On XO-1, we have a long painful history with synaptics and the EC,
that's led to it being disabled. Instead we use the PS2 protocol.
I just realised that we still do that on XO-1.5 on F11 and F14 builds,
and can't find commentary from anyone trying anything different.
Are there reasons to think S
On 28 October 2010 15:54, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On XO-1, we have a long painful history with synaptics and the EC,
> that's led to it being disabled. Instead we use the PS2 protocol.
>
> I just realised that we still do that on XO-1.5 on F11 and F14 builds,
> and can't find commentary from anyo
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> Are there reasons to think Synaptics may now work?
>
> As far as I know there is still no explanation nor diagnosis for the
> super-strange EC behaviour in this mode. I don't know if anyone has
> tested if the same occurs on XO-1.5.
Well, I
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 28 October 2010 15:54, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> On XO-1, we have a long painful history with synaptics and the EC,
>> that's led to it being disabled. Instead we use the PS2 protocol.
>>
>> I just realised that we still do that on XO-1.5
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 04:46:12AM +0800, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> IIRC (and it's been a long time, so don't trust me on this) the
> Synaptics PS/2 protocol involves more 'context' than the standard
> mouse packet format, making it more likely that dropped PS/2 bytes
> could lead to desynchronizat
martin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> >> Are there reasons to think Synaptics may now work?
> >
> > As far as I know there is still no explanation nor diagnosis for the
> > super-strange EC behaviour in this mode. I don't know if anyone has
> > tested if the
On 11/01/2010 01:33 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
> martin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > >> Are there reasons to think Synaptics may now work?
> > >
> > > As far as I know there is still no explanation nor diagnosis for the
> > > super-strange EC beh
On 10/28/2010 04:25 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> super-strange EC behaviour in this mode. I don't know if anyone has
>> tested if the same occurs on XO-1.5.
>
> Well, I have now.
>
> Works very nicely, does not show any of the scary issues discussed in
> #8901. It may still be spewing too much in
