Re: XO-1.5 image has more size than XO-1.0 with the same software

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Esteban Arias wrote: > but, XO-1.5 image has more size than XO-1.0 ¿?¿?¿?¿? Do you know why? As others have pointed out, compression is the difference. The build usually creates a .tar.lzma file, you can compare the size of the tar.lzma file between the two builds.

Re: Fwd: XO-1.5 image has more size than XO-1.0 with the same software

Hi, On Fri, Jun 01 2012, Daniel Drake wrote: >> Can I compress for XO-1.5 ? > > If you switch to a filesystem that supports it, yes. btrfs would be one > option. > > Note that this will kill performance. And reliability. :-) (Before Linux 3.4, btrfs' preferred method of dealing with a detected

Re: Fwd: XO-1.5 image has more size than XO-1.0 with the same software

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Esteban Arias wrote: > Can I compress for XO-1.5 ? If you switch to a filesystem that supports it, yes. btrfs would be one option. Note that this will kill performance. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.

Re: Fwd: XO-1.5 image has more size than XO-1.0 with the same software

Can I compress for XO-1.5 ? 2012/6/1 Chris Ball > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 01 2012, Esteban Arias wrote: > > I have the same activities. > > And this difference packages: > > Ah. Well, one difference will be that jffs2 uses compression and ext3 > doesn't, but I wasn't expecting that to account for s

Re: Fwd: XO-1.5 image has more size than XO-1.0 with the same software

Hi, On Fri, Jun 01 2012, Esteban Arias wrote: > I have the same activities. > And this difference packages: Ah. Well, one difference will be that jffs2 uses compression and ext3 doesn't, but I wasn't expecting that to account for such a large change. - Chris. -- Chris Ball

Re: XO-1.5 image has more size than XO-1.0 with the same software

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Esteban Arias wrote: > Hi, > > I have created image for XO-1.0 with gnome and XO-1.5 (2GB) with gnome. > > but, XO-1.5 image has more size than XO-1.0 ¿?¿?¿?¿? Do you know why? The XO-1 filesystem (jffs2) compresses its files, and the XO-1.5 filesystem (ext4) does

Re: Fwd: XO-1.5 image has more size than XO-1.0 with the same software

I have the same activities. And this difference packages: < kernel-2.6.35.13_xo1-20120508.1133.olpc.eb0c7a8.i586 > kernel-2.6.35.13_xo1.5-20120508.1139.olpc.eb0c7a8.i586 < libertas-usb8388-firmware-5.110.22.p23-4.fc13.noarch > libertas-sd8686-firmware-9.70.20.p0-1.fc14.noarch > libXaw-1.0.6-4.fc12

Re: Fwd: XO-1.5 image has more size than XO-1.0 with the same software

Hi, On Fri, Jun 01 2012, Esteban Arias wrote: > Hi, > > I have created image for XO-1.0 with gnome and XO-1.5 (2GB) with gnome. > > but, XO-1.5 image has more size than XO-1.0 ¿?¿?¿?¿? Do you know why?  Because the 1.3GB XO-1.5 image wouldn't fit on the 1.0GB XO-1 flash. I think that, for exampl

Fwd: XO-1.5 image has more size than XO-1.0 with the same software

Hi, I have created image for XO-1.0 with gnome and XO-1.5 (2GB) with gnome. but, XO-1.5 image has more size than XO-1.0 ¿?¿?¿?¿? Do you know why? *XO-1.0*: df -H S.ficheros Size Used Avail Use% Montado en /dev/root 1,1G 581M 494M 55% / tmpfs 11