Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-11 Thread James Cameron
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:41:16AM -0400, Richard A. Smith wrote: > On 06/10/2012 01:07 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > > >Took some time and a lot of juggling and ended up to a lot of > >questionmarks in black diamonds so I do not really know if I did it > >right or wrong, but here is the scre

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-11 Thread Richard A. Smith
On 06/10/2012 01:07 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: Took some time and a lot of juggling and ended up to a lot of questionmarks in black diamonds so I do not really know if I did it right or wrong, but here is the screen log just the same. You may or may not have done anything wrong but the

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-10 Thread James Cameron
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 10:07:36PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > Also I had a hard time detaching from the screen. Maybe > the wiki page needs some clarification. > What "C-a" means? "Capital C, dash, a" 3 consecutive characters? > "ctrl+a"? "shift-c-a" keys together? other? C-a means ctrl

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-09 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Sun, 6/3/12, Richard A. Smith wrote: > From: Richard A. Smith > Subject: Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4] > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org > Date: Sunday, June 3, 2012, 8:41 AM > On 06/03/2012 04:43 AM, Y

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-03 Thread Richard A. Smith
On 06/03/2012 04:43 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: serial connector loaded. Its the connector under the heat spreader. There goes my new XO-1.75... Think of it a a rite of passage. Just to be sure, is the UART 4, CN23, shown in the attached picture in blue. Correct? Correct. If OK,

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-02 Thread Richard Smith
>> then.  Do you >> have a XO-1.5 or 1.75? Something with an EC serial connector >> loaded? > > I have the adaptor on the J1 of an XO-1. Will it do? No. > If not, where is CN24? (a picture or a reference to the XO-1 board will help) XO-1 did not ship with an EC connector loaded. That's why I ask

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-02 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Sat, 6/2/12, Richard Smith wrote: > From: Richard Smith > Subject: Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4] > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org > Date: Saturday, June 2, 2012, 8:27 AM > > This battery is really >

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-02 Thread Richard Smith
>> > I'm very suspect of this measurement.  The 1.5 has >> a hardware floating >> > point unit and the 1.75 is still using >> soft-float.  Its extremely unlikely >> > that the floating point performance on 1.75 is better >> than the 1.5. >> > >> >> Hard FP status depends on if Yioryos is running 11

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-02 Thread Richard Smith
> This battery is really strange... > After an O/N with the battery out of the XO tried to run it down and suddenly > none of the info in /sys/devices/0.baterry/power_supply/olpc-battery/ was > changing after an hour of CPU burn and the battery was showing as "Full" > Shutdown and removing the ba

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-01 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
> > I don't see anything that looks obviously wrong.  So > here's a test to > see if the EC is going to sleep or not.  Run the > battery down to where > the red LED is active.  Then power off the > laptop.  If the EC goes into > stop mode the red LED should go out after a few > seconds.  If you

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-01 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
> > > >  Most of the test had empty values but the > informative ones (below) show > >> that the XO-1.5 is better in basic integer > operations and memory bandwidth > >> while the XO-1.75 is better in float and double > operations as well as in > >> memory latency. > >> I'm not sure how much this m