Yo all
As you may have seen from earlier emails, I encountered some
difficulty in modifying existing APIs within the streamlined build
system. After some effort, I think I have defined a method for
modifying the API-level of a subsystem that gets around some of the
problems. I thought I might
Let's put 1.0.1rc1 through the wringer:
http://www.open-mpi.org/software/v1.0/downloads/openmpi-1.0.1rc1.tar.gz
http://www.open-mpi.org/software/v1.0/downloads/openmpi-1.0.1rc1.tar.bz2
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} The Open MPI Project
{+} http://www.open-mpi.org/
I just added a NEWS file in both v1.0 and the trunk. It's meant to be
a list of user-noticable changes between versions. We found in LAM
that users look at it to see what's new between successive release
versions. It was also helpful for users searching for specific bug
fixes (e.g., they fou
Folks --
We just found a fairly serious issue in the sm btl that is going to
force a 1.0.1 in the Near Future (i.e., sooner than we expected).
Specifically, at least part of the sm btl fixes from the trunk did not
make it into the 1.0 release (I'm looking through the logs to figure
out what
There were a whole bunch of Makefile.am changes that changed where
things got compiled in a recent update. You might want to
re-autogen/configure.
On Nov 21, 2005, at 4:24 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
Guys,
Forget about this email, I found the answer by myself The problem
seems to be not with
Guys,
Forget about this email, I found the answer by myself The problem
seems to be not with libtool but with the way the last update worked.
If I compile using VPATH I get the error. If I go in the respective
directory and first do make (not make install) then the problem does
not appear
I remember a discussion few weeks ago about the devel package
required by libtool in order to be able to compile Open MPI. But as
far as I remember the conclusion is that we will not require it as we
have our own ... I am wrong about that ? After updating to the latest
trunk on all of the c
Hi Ralf
Appreciate the offer, but I think at this stage it isn't worth the
hassle. We either implement a long-term fix, or just pay the price.
Thanks though
Ralph
At 01:37 AM 11/21/2005, you wrote:
Hi Ralph,
* Ralph H. Castain wrote on Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 04:04:34AM CET:
> Just as an FYI -
Yeah, I recall the discussions and we did, in fact, bring the
subdirectory thing up. What I'm now seeing is that, at least for me,
I hadn't really realized the full implications of that decision. It
works great if you are just making changes within an existing
subsystem - but if you need to mod
Hi Ralph,
* Ralph H. Castain wrote on Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 04:04:34AM CET:
> Just as an FYI -- this proposed fix didn't work. It apparently takes
> a great deal more to "undo" the Makefile consolidation. I worked on
> it for a couple of hours and finally just gave up.
I'm sorry. If you describ
10 matches
Mail list logo
