Re: [OMPI devel] [IPv6] new component oob/tcp6

2006-09-06 Thread Ralph H Castain
On 9/6/06 9:44 AM, "Christian Kauhaus" wrote: > Bogdan Costescu : >> I don't know why you think that this (talking to different nodes via >> different channels) is unusual - I think that it's quite probable, >> especially in a heterogenous environment. > > I think the first goal should be to

Re: [OMPI devel] [IPv6] new component oob/tcp6

2006-09-06 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 05:44:23PM +0200, Christian Kauhaus wrote: > Our current plan is to look into the hostfile and see if there are > > (1a) just IPv4 addresses > (1b) IPv4 addresses and hostnames for which 'A' queries can be resolved > (2a) just IPv6 addresses > (2b) IPv6 addresses and host

Re: [OMPI devel] [IPv6] new component oob/tcp6

2006-09-06 Thread Christian Kauhaus
Bogdan Costescu : >I don't know why you think that this (talking to different nodes via >different channels) is unusual - I think that it's quite probable, >especially in a heterogenous environment. I think the first goal should be to get IPv6 working -- and this is much more easier when we rest

Re: [OMPI devel] [IPv6] new component oob/tcp6

2006-09-06 Thread Ralph H Castain
Actually, I was a part of that thread - see my comments beginning with http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2006/03/0797.php. Perhaps I communicated poorly here. The issue in the prior thread was that few systems nowadays don't offer at least some level of IPv6 compatibility, even if noth

Re: [OMPI devel] [IPv6] new component oob/tcp6

2006-09-06 Thread Bogdan Costescu
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Ralph Castain wrote: > The only use case I am really concerned about is that of a Head Node > Process (HNP) that needs to talk to both IPv6 and IPv4 systems. I > admit this will be unusual, This and other aspects were discussed or at least mentioned in a thread starting at:

Re: [OMPI devel] [Open MPI] #334: Building with Libtool 2.1a fails to run OpenIB BTL

2006-09-06 Thread Jeff Squyres
On 9/6/06 9:37 AM, "Ralf Wildenhues" wrote: >> This error is usually happens when libibverbs is dlopened without >> RTLD_GLOBAL flag. > > Ah, yep. That is a difference between 2.1a and 1.5.x. Not an > undisputed one. > > I don't know enough about the setup to suggest a workaround right away.

Re: [OMPI devel] [Open MPI] #334: Building with Libtool 2.1a fails to run OpenIB BTL

2006-09-06 Thread Jeff Squyres
On 9/6/06 9:05 AM, "Ralf Wildenhues" wrote: >> I was testing with a trivial "hello world" MPI application; i.e., one that >> I had compiled with mpicc and was running with "mpirun -np 2 --mca btl >> openib hello". Hence, I was testing against installed trees of Open MPI. >> I took care to "r

Re: [OMPI devel] [Open MPI] #334: Building with Libtool 2.1a fails to run OpenIB BTL

2006-09-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Gleb Natapov wrote on Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 03:26:38PM CEST: > This error is usually happens when libibverbs is dlopened without > RTLD_GLOBAL flag. Ah, yep. That is a difference between 2.1a and 1.5.x. Not an undisputed one. I don't know enough about the setup to suggest a workaround right aw

Re: [OMPI devel] [Open MPI] #334: Building with Libtool 2.1a fails to run OpenIB BTL

2006-09-06 Thread Gleb Natapov
This error is usually happens when libibverbs is dlopened without RTLD_GLOBAL flag. On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 03:05:39PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello, > > * Open MPI wrote on Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 01:00:00PM CEST: > > #334: Building with Libtool 2.1a fails to run OpenIB BTL > > >Are yo

Re: [OMPI devel] [Open MPI] #334: Building with Libtool 2.1a fails to run OpenIB BTL

2006-09-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello, * Open MPI wrote on Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 01:00:00PM CEST: > #334: Building with Libtool 2.1a fails to run OpenIB BTL >Are you testing uninstalled or installed programs/libraries? > > Installed. > >If you are testing an uninstalled program: does libtool generate a shell > wrappe