We could also call it 'null' for the empty set of components? Or maybe
OMPI-NULL.
Outside of the naming do others this this is a useful feature to
implement?
-- Josh
On May 2, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
I would think that adding a special keyword would be the correct
> Can I make a /tmp branch from the hg read-only branch that is not tied
> to the svn /tmp branches.
Why do you want to do that?
Mercurial is a fully distributed system, so you could just start
committing to one of your local copies of the repository, and I can't
see anything missing that a
Sure:
hg clone http://www.open-mpi.org/hg/hgwebdir.cgi/ompi-svn-mirror my-tmp
On 5/2/08 9:57 AM, "Terry Dontje" wrote:
> Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> On May 2, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Is there a way to make a hg specific /tmp branch?
>>>
>>
Jeff Squyres wrote:
On May 2, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
Is there a way to make a hg specific /tmp branch?
I'm not sure what you're asking...?
Can I make a /tmp branch from the hg read-only branch that is not tied
to the svn /tmp branches.
--td
On May 2, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
Is there a way to make a hg specific /tmp branch?
I'm not sure what you're asking...?
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
Jeff Squyres wrote:
Taking steps towards Mercurial, we have setup a read-only Mercurial
mirror of the official OMPI SVN repository:
http://www.open-mpi.org/hg/hgwebdir.cgi/ompi-svn-mirror/
Anything you commit to SVN should show up on the HG mirror within 30
minutes.
This mirror is
I would think that adding a special keyword would be the correct method. I
would suggest something with an "ompi" in it, perhaps capitalized so there
is no confusion...something like "OMPI-NONE"?
On 5/2/08 8:37 AM, "Josh Hursey" wrote:
> I don't believe we have the logic
Taking steps towards Mercurial, we have setup a read-only Mercurial
mirror of the official OMPI SVN repository:
http://www.open-mpi.org/hg/hgwebdir.cgi/ompi-svn-mirror/
Anything you commit to SVN should show up on the HG mirror within 30
minutes.
This mirror is currently *only* the
I don't believe we have the logic in place to tell mca_component_open
'do not open anything'. (I could be wrong though).
Adding such an option might be useful, but we would have to consider
how that option should be specified by the user. Currently if you do
not set a value (leave empty
I see what the problem is. In the case of slurm, I don't want -any-
components to be opened, even though I am going to call plm open/select. I
have to leave that logic in place for those environments that -do- want to
specify some backend secondary launcher.
So the question is: how do I tell
Well, I have a current version of the trunk. I add an MCA param to the
environment indicating that only rsh is to be used by the orted. Yet I get
an output from every orted indicating that slurm (misspelled!) is available
for selection.
This tells me that the slurm component is being opened, even
Was merged into the trunk early this morning. OOB/XOOB is still the
default. Let me know if anyone sees any problems.
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
(moving to devel list for wider audience)
Hmm. I thought the UTK stuff from a while ago supposedly changed this
behavior to only open the components that were specifically requested.
This behavior looks like the *original* MCA behavior -- open them all,
then discard what we don't want
13 matches
Mail list logo