Re: [OMPI devel] MCA component open

2008-05-02 Thread Josh Hursey
We could also call it 'null' for the empty set of components? Or maybe OMPI-NULL. Outside of the naming do others this this is a useful feature to implement? -- Josh On May 2, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: I would think that adding a special keyword would be the correct

Re: [OMPI devel] OMPI Mercurial read-only mirror

2008-05-02 Thread Roland Dreier
> Can I make a /tmp branch from the hg read-only branch that is not tied > to the svn /tmp branches. Why do you want to do that? Mercurial is a fully distributed system, so you could just start committing to one of your local copies of the repository, and I can't see anything missing that a

Re: [OMPI devel] OMPI Mercurial read-only mirror

2008-05-02 Thread Ralph Castain
Sure: hg clone http://www.open-mpi.org/hg/hgwebdir.cgi/ompi-svn-mirror my-tmp On 5/2/08 9:57 AM, "Terry Dontje" wrote: > Jeff Squyres wrote: >> On May 2, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Terry Dontje wrote: >> >> >>> Is there a way to make a hg specific /tmp branch? >>> >>

Re: [OMPI devel] OMPI Mercurial read-only mirror

2008-05-02 Thread Terry Dontje
Jeff Squyres wrote: On May 2, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Terry Dontje wrote: Is there a way to make a hg specific /tmp branch? I'm not sure what you're asking...? Can I make a /tmp branch from the hg read-only branch that is not tied to the svn /tmp branches. --td

Re: [OMPI devel] OMPI Mercurial read-only mirror

2008-05-02 Thread Jeff Squyres
On May 2, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Terry Dontje wrote: Is there a way to make a hg specific /tmp branch? I'm not sure what you're asking...? -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems

Re: [OMPI devel] OMPI Mercurial read-only mirror

2008-05-02 Thread Terry Dontje
Jeff Squyres wrote: Taking steps towards Mercurial, we have setup a read-only Mercurial mirror of the official OMPI SVN repository: http://www.open-mpi.org/hg/hgwebdir.cgi/ompi-svn-mirror/ Anything you commit to SVN should show up on the HG mirror within 30 minutes. This mirror is

Re: [OMPI devel] MCA component open

2008-05-02 Thread Ralph Castain
I would think that adding a special keyword would be the correct method. I would suggest something with an "ompi" in it, perhaps capitalized so there is no confusion...something like "OMPI-NONE"? On 5/2/08 8:37 AM, "Josh Hursey" wrote: > I don't believe we have the logic

[OMPI devel] OMPI Mercurial read-only mirror

2008-05-02 Thread Jeff Squyres
Taking steps towards Mercurial, we have setup a read-only Mercurial mirror of the official OMPI SVN repository: http://www.open-mpi.org/hg/hgwebdir.cgi/ompi-svn-mirror/ Anything you commit to SVN should show up on the HG mirror within 30 minutes. This mirror is currently *only* the

Re: [OMPI devel] MCA component open

2008-05-02 Thread Josh Hursey
I don't believe we have the logic in place to tell mca_component_open 'do not open anything'. (I could be wrong though). Adding such an option might be useful, but we would have to consider how that option should be specified by the user. Currently if you do not set a value (leave empty

Re: [OMPI devel] MCA component open

2008-05-02 Thread Ralph Castain
I see what the problem is. In the case of slurm, I don't want -any- components to be opened, even though I am going to call plm open/select. I have to leave that logic in place for those environments that -do- want to specify some backend secondary launcher. So the question is: how do I tell

Re: [OMPI devel] MCA component open

2008-05-02 Thread Ralph Castain
Well, I have a current version of the trunk. I add an MCA param to the environment indicating that only rsh is to be used by the orted. Yet I get an output from every orted indicating that slurm (misspelled!) is available for selection. This tells me that the slurm component is being opened, even

[OMPI devel] cpc openib stuff

2008-05-02 Thread Jeff Squyres
Was merged into the trunk early this morning. OOB/XOOB is still the default. Let me know if anyone sees any problems. -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems

Re: [OMPI devel] MCA component open

2008-05-02 Thread Jeff Squyres
(moving to devel list for wider audience) Hmm. I thought the UTK stuff from a while ago supposedly changed this behavior to only open the components that were specifically requested. This behavior looks like the *original* MCA behavior -- open them all, then discard what we don't want