Jon Mason wrote:
I am seeing some unusual behavior during the shutdown phase of ompi at the end
of my testcase. While running a IMB pingpong test over the rdmacm on openib, I
get cq flush errors on my iWARP adapters.
This error is happening because the remote node is still polling the endpoin
I am seeing some unusual behavior during the shutdown phase of ompi at the end
of my testcase. While running a IMB pingpong test over the rdmacm on openib, I
get cq flush errors on my iWARP adapters.
This error is happening because the remote node is still polling the endpoint
while the other
Awesome.
The branch is updated to the latest trunk head. I encourage folks to
check out this repository and make sure that it builds on their
system. A normal build of the branch should be enough to find out if
there are any cut-n-paste problems (though I tried to be careful,
mistakes do
Yes, you are exactly right -- I was not verbose enough to express what
I meant.
Given that we're somewhat wary about the immature state of HG's
toolset, it could be a good interim solution until someday possibly
entirely switching to HG.
On May 5, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Josh Hursey wrote:
A feature like this would be useful for a large project to stage the
transition from SVN to HG such that it does not occur abruptly. I
don't know if it would be useful or not as a permanent solution, but
something to consider.
It is certainly something interesting to watch.
-- Josh
On M
Depending on how that works, it could be quite interesting -- it opens
up the possibility of leaving SVN as the "back-end" repository, but
also fully supporting HG as well. I don't know if that's really
sensible / useful (i.e., why not fully convert to HG if we're going to
do HG), but it's
Per our conversation in Chicago - It looks like Mercurial has a Google
Summer of Code student working on the Mercurial -push-> Subversion
problem we were talking about:
http://code.google.com/soc/2008/hg/appinfo.html?
csaid=2757CDDD2156F1A7
For those not at the meeting this has to do with
This all sounds good to me!
On Apr 29, 2008, at 6:35 PM, Josh Hursey wrote:
What: Add mca_base_select() and adjust frameworks & components to use
it.
Why: Consolidation of code for general goodness.
Where: https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi/tmp-public/jjh-mca-play
When: Code ready now. Docum
On May 5, 2008, at 7:49 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
Mercurial is a fully distributed system. So instead of thinking
of /tmp
branch, you should think of publishing your repository, which has
your
commits in it. As I understand it, open-mpi.org is not set up for
publishing other repositories yet
Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > Can I make a /tmp branch from the hg read-only branch that is not tied
> > > to the svn /tmp branches.
> > Why do you want to do that?
> >
> > Mercurial is a fully distributed system, so you could just start
> > committing to one of your local copies of the re
10 matches
Mail list logo
