[OMPI devel] MCA param aliases/etc.

2008-07-16 Thread Jeff Squyres
Brad / George -- As part of the MCA param review (v1.2 vs. v1.3), if we want to use the "deprecated" or "alias" features, I can bring over the new functionality from the trunk to the v1.3 tree. Perhaps we should have a first cut of the MCA param comparison next Tuesday. It would be helpf

Re: [OMPI devel] ompi_ignore dr pml?

2008-07-16 Thread Jeff Squyres
I talked to Tim Mattox yesterday; IU is kosher with removing the dr pml from v1.3. It's still on the trunk in case someone wants to do something with it someday. On Jul 15, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Andrew Friedley wrote: The UD BTL currently relies on DR for reliability; though in the near fut

[OMPI devel] PathScale compiler ( ticket #1326 )

2008-07-16 Thread Lenny Verkhovsky
Hi, Jeff, I succeded to compile and run simple C++ app with PathScale 3.2 evaluation version. look below. Maybe you had some installation / licence problems. I was in touch with Ben v...@pathscale.com from PathScale support who helped me with installation. #head config.log This file contains an

Re: [OMPI devel] IBCM error

2008-07-16 Thread Don Kerr
Jeff Squyres wrote: On Jul 15, 2008, at 7:30 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: Minor clarification: we did not test RDMACM on RoadRunner. Just for further clarification - I did, and it wasn't a particularly good experience. Encountered several problems, none of them overwhelming, hence my comment

Re: [OMPI devel] IBCM error

2008-07-16 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jul 16, 2008, at 11:07 AM, Don Kerr wrote: Pasha added configure switches for this about a week ago: --en|disable-openib-ibcm --en|disable-openib-rdmacm I like these flags but I thought there was going to be a run time check for cases where Open MPI is built on a system that has ibcm

Re: [OMPI devel] PathScale compiler ( ticket #1326 )

2008-07-16 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jul 16, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote: I succeded to compile and run simple C++ app with PathScale 3.2 evaluation version. look below. Maybe you had some installation / licence problems. Nope -- it still fails for me with 3.1.99 on the trunk today; it's not a license proble