On Aug 6, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
I'm therefore going to change the mpool string names that btl/sm and
coll/sm are looking for so that they get unique sm mpool modules.
(another case of "I knew what I meant, but that's not what I typed")
I'm going to [try to] change
Ok, with Terry's help, I found a segv in the coll sm. If you run
without the sm btl, there's an obvious bad parameter that we're
passing that results in a segv.
LANL -- can you confirm / deny that these are the segv's that you were
seeing?
While fixing this, I noticed that the sm btl and
Is it time to "svn rm ompi/mca/pml/dr"?
On Aug 4, 2009, at 6:50 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Rolf/Mouhamed
Could you get together off-list to discuss the different approaches
and see if/where there is common ground. It would be nice to see an
integrated solution - personally, I would rather not s
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> -Source: openmpi-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
> +Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
The spec file parser defines some of these variables by default. F.e.
after encountering at the top of the file:
Name: fftw
Version: 2.1.5
Release: 5.bc
somet
On Aug 6, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Sylvain Jeaugey wrote:
> -Source: openmpi-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
> +Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
>
> Does this mean that you're looking for a different tarball name?
I'm not
> sure that's good; the tarball should be an openmpi tarball,
regardless
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for reviewing my changes !
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Jeff Squyres wrote:
-Source: openmpi-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
+Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
Does this mean that you're looking for a different tarball name? I'm not
sure that's good; the tarball should be an openmp
Thanks! A few questions about this patch:
-Source: openmpi-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
+Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.$EXTENSION
Does this mean that you're looking for a different tarball name? I'm
not sure that's good; the tarball should be an openmpi tarball,
regardless of what name it ge
Hello All,
This may not be something relates to the forum, so sorry for asking this
first of all :). Currently I have been working on an implementation of
parallel Quicksort using MPI and now I need some standard parallel Quicksort
implementation(s) for a performance evaluation. So can someone reco
