Hello all,
In order to add some real-time feature to the OpenMPI for some research ,I
need a OpenMPI version running on VxWorks. But after going through the
Open-MPI website ,I can’t found any indication that it supports VxWorks .
Follow the thread posted by Ralph Castain ,
http://www.open-mp
Very good - that is pretty much all that the signal_job API does.
On Mar 17, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Leonardo Fialho wrote:
> Anyway, to signal another job I have sent a RML message with the
> ORTE_DAEMON_SIGNAL_LOCAL_PROCS command to the proc's HNP.
>
> Leonardo
>
> On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:59 PM, Ral
Anyway, to signal another job I have sent a RML message with the
ORTE_DAEMON_SIGNAL_LOCAL_PROCS command to the proc's HNP.
Leonardo
On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:59 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Sorry, I was out snowshoeing today - and about 3 miles out, I suddenly
> realized the problem :-/
>
> Terry i
Sorry, I was out snowshoeing today - and about 3 miles out, I suddenly realized
the problem :-/
Terry is correct - we don't initialize the plm framework in application
processes. However, there is a default proxy module for that framework so that
applications can call comm_spawn. Unfortunately,
Hi all,
I use a very simple datatype defined as follow:
lng[0]= 1;
dsp[0]= 1;
err=MPI_Type_indexed(1, lng, dsp, MPI_CHAR, &offtype);
err=MPI_Type_create_resized(offtype, 0, 2, &filetype);
MPI_Type_commit(&filetype);
This datatype consists of a hole (of length 1 char) followed by
Yes, I know the difference :)
I'm trying to call orte_plm.signal_job from a PML component. I think PLM stays
resident after launching but it doesn't only for mpirun and orted, you're right.
On Mar 17, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Terry Dontje wrote:
> On 03/17/2010 10:10 AM, Leonardo Fialho wrote:
>>
>>
On 03/17/2010 10:10 AM, Leonardo Fialho wrote:
Wow... orte_plm.signal_job points to zero. Is it correct from the PML
point of view?
It might be because plm's are really only used at launch time not in MPI
processes. Note plm != pml.
--td
Leonardo
On Mar 17, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Leonardo Fialh
Wow... orte_plm.signal_job points to zero. Is it correct from the PML point of
view?
Leonardo
On Mar 17, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Leonardo Fialho wrote:
> To clarify a little bit more: I'm calling orte_plm.signal_job from a PML
> component, I know that ORTE is bellow OMPI, but I think that this funct
Can you print out what orte_plm.signal_job value is? I bet it is
pointing to address 0. So the question is orte_plm actually initialized
in an MPI process? My guess would be no but I am sure Ralph will be
able to answer more definitively.
--td
On 03/17/2010 09:52 AM, Leonardo Fialho wrote:
To clarify a little bit more: I'm calling orte_plm.signal_job from a PML
component, I know that ORTE is bellow OMPI, but I think that this function
could not be available, or something like this. I can't figure out where is
this snprintf too, in my code there is only
opal_output(0, "receive
Thanks for clarifying - guess I won't chew just yet. :-)
I still don't see in your trace where it is failing in signal_job. I didn't see
the message indicating it was sending the signal cmd out in your prior debug
output, and there isn't a printf in that code loop other than the debug output.
C
Ralph don't swallow your message yet... Both jobs are not running over the same
mpirun. There are two instances of mpirun in which one runs with "-report-uri
../contact.txt" and the other receives its contact info using "-ompi-server
file:../contact.txt". And yes, both processes are running with
ok, got it !
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:31 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> For the sake of completeness, and for the enlightenment of all interested
> developers, I would prefer if we keep the discussion going on this mailing
> list (so we will have a searchable trace for the future).
>
> george.
>
>
Hi George ,
Thank you very much!
i really had saw these functions before ,but it's a long time ,i can't find
it !
Thank you very much,you save me a lot of time.
Thanks & Regards,
Yaohui Hu
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:28 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> Yaohui,
>
> The callback functions are registered
For the sake of completeness, and for the enlightenment of all interested
developers, I would prefer if we keep the discussion going on this mailing list
(so we will have a searchable trace for the future).
george.
On Mar 17, 2010, at 01:25 , hu yaohui wrote:
> Hi George,
> did you have a gm
Yaohui,
The callback functions are registered by any modules that can handle network
communications. In your specific case I would guess it is the PML. Look in
mca/pml/ob1/pml_ob1.c starting from line 364 to see what callbacks are
registered by OB1.
george.
On Mar 17, 2010, at 01:22 , hu ya
Hi George,
did you have a gmail or msn? i really want to talk to you directly.That's
much fast.
Thanks & Regards
Yaohui Hu
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:42 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> Yoahui,
>
> The self component is special. While is does behave as a "normal" BTL, it
> takes a lot of shortcuts as
Hi Geogre,
Thank you very much!
i know ,it's really a receive callback in this send function
mca_btl_self_send,what i want to know is where this callback function(line
303).
303reg = mca_btl_base_active_message_trigger + tag;
304reg->cbfunc( btl, tag, des, reg->cbdata );
mapped to,where
I'm going to have to eat my last message. It slipped past me that your other
job was started via comm_spawn. Since both "jobs" are running under the same
mpirun, there shouldn't be a problem sending a signal between them.
I don't know why this would be crashing. Are you sure it is crashing in
Yoahui,
The self component is special. While is does behave as a "normal" BTL, it takes
a lot of shortcuts as all operations are in the memory of a single process.
However, as the simplest BTLs in Open MPI, I guess it is a good starting point.
As stated previously, the self BTL exhibit a lot of
Hi George,
what i want to do is to modify the self component to meet my needs,i just
want to modify the send function of the self component to test whether my
implemented send function ,which based on some emulation platform, is
right.so i copied all the self component code,modified the component n
Yaohui,
The whole infrastructure at the level where you're looking is similar to Active
Messages. The register function is used to register callback for a specific
tag. A tag is a uint8_t, and thus there are 256 callbacks possible. However,
there are some rules regarding which level is allowed
22 matches
Mail list logo
