Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5.1: one idea

2010-10-11 Thread Graham, Richard L.
Why go to all this effort, and not just fork 1.7 from the trunk, skipping the whole merge process ? Seems like it would be much more prudent to spend time on improving the code base, adding missing MPI support, etc., rather than spending the time on a merge. Rich On 10/8/10 6:34 PM, "Jeff

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5.1: one idea

2010-10-11 Thread Terry Dontje
On 10/11/2010 06:11 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: On Oct 10, 2010, at 7:49 AM, Terry Dontje wrote: At first glance this sounds like a sane approach but didn't we start with this same approach with 1.5.0? I know it was kind of required to do it for 1.5.0 but we did go off track with delivery. I

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5.1: one idea

2010-10-11 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Oct 10, 2010, at 7:49 AM, Terry Dontje wrote: > At first glance this sounds like a sane approach but didn't we start with > this same approach with 1.5.0? I know it was kind of required to do it for > 1.5.0 but we did go off track with delivery. I believe to be successful at > making a de