Re: [OMPI devel] Uninitialized ORTE epoch values

2011-08-05 Thread Ralph Castain
Thanks for the explanation. It kinda begs a question, though - I've noticed that the assignment of epoch seems to circle around in a number of places. We call the ess_base function to get_epoch, and then we assign an epoch. But the base function actually seem to do much, if anything. It's

Re: [OMPI devel] Uninitialized ORTE epoch values

2011-08-05 Thread Thomas Herault
The warnings issued through ess_base_select.c:46 are annoying but harmless. Wesley is going to hunt them and remove them, but they are really issued because of the print: orte_ess_base_proc_get_epoch (ess_base_select.c:46) calls ORTE_NAME_PRINT(proc), which prints proc->epoch, before

Re: [OMPI devel] Uninitialized ORTE epoch values

2011-08-05 Thread Wesley Bland
I don't think these are anything to worry about since they're all print statements, but I will work on these tonight. On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Ralph and I are trying to track down the mysterious ORTE error. > > In doing so, I have found at least

Re: [OMPI devel] Uninitialized ORTE epoch values

2011-08-05 Thread Jeff Squyres
BTW, the -1 file has an invalid free in it that we just fixed. That's not part of the epoch value issue, of course. :-) On Aug 5, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Ralph and I are trying to track down the mysterious ORTE error. > > In doing so, I have found at least one fairly

[OMPI devel] Uninitialized ORTE epoch values

2011-08-05 Thread Jeff Squyres
Ralph and I are trying to track down the mysterious ORTE error. In doing so, I have found at least one fairly repeatable error on my cluster: when running through SLURM the ibm/dynamic/spawn test, where we mpirun 3 procs and then we MPI_COMM_SPAWN 3 more. Running the orteds through valgrind,

Re: [OMPI devel] Open MPI + HWLOC + Static build issue

2011-08-05 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Aug 5, 2011, at 5:55 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: >> Libtool's -all-static flag probably resolves to some gcc flag(s), right? >> Can you just pass those in via CFLAGS / LDFLAGS to configure and then not >> pass anything in via make? > > I only see an additional -static flag on the final

Re: [OMPI devel] Open MPI + HWLOC + Static build issue

2011-08-05 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 04/08/2011 02:24, Jeff Squyres a écrit : > Libtool's -all-static flag probably resolves to some gcc flag(s), right? Can > you just pass those in via CFLAGS / LDFLAGS to configure and then not pass > anything in via make? I only see an additional -static flag on the final program-link gcc