On Aug 3, 2012, at 6:24 PM, Paul Kapinos wrote:
> testing our well-known example of the registered memory problem (see
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2012/02/18565.php) on
> freshly-installed 1.6.1rc2, found out that "Fall back to send/receive
> semantics" did not work always i
Hi Christopher,
I cannot reproduce your problem on my fresh installed 1.6.1rc2. I've
used the attached program which is essentially your test case with a
bit modification sin order to make in compilable.
The 1.6 tree works fine for me, its only trunk (I haven't tried 1.7).
Any chance you could
This may be useful.
Attached is a patch tarball with the updates - may make quick reviews easier.
Thanks,
Sam
On Aug 6, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Gutierrez, Samuel K wrote:
> Thanks, Jeff.
>
> FWIW, I just finished testing with knem support enabled. Looks good.
>
> Sam
>
> On Aug 6, 2012, at 2:21 PM
Eugene -- somehow this slipped by me in the disaster that is my inbox. Sorry!
Answers below...
On Jul 31, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
>> What specifically do you propose? I don't remember offhand if the status
>> conversion macros are the same as the regular int/INTEGER conversion
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:43:22 +0200
Paul Kapinos wrote:
> Christopher,
> I cannot reproduce your problem on my fresh installed 1.6.1rc2. I've
> used the attached program which is essentially your test case with a
> bit modification sin order to make in compilable.
The 1.6 tree works fin
As we told in the last teleconference, a few lines about our work in the
University of Extremadura related to Open MPI:
We are developing new (proof-of-concept) collective and mpool components for
improving the collective operations performance. New collective algorithms
require user buffers on
