r27178 seems to build fine. Thanks.
On 8/29/2012 7:42 AM, Shamis, Pavel wrote:
Eugene,
Can you please confirm that the issue is resolved on your setup ?
On Aug 29, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Shamis, Pavel wrote:
The issue #2 was fixed in r27178.
(+1 -- was wondering the same thing...)
On Aug 29, 2012, at 12:05 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> I don't want to spark the pro/cons debate about inline, I just wonder if
> there is any tangible proof that forcing functions with hundreds/tens of
> lines of code to be inlined is of any benefit?
>
I don't want to spark the pro/cons debate about inline, I just wonder if there
is any tangible proof that forcing functions with hundreds/tens of lines of
code to be inlined is of any benefit?
george.
On Aug 29, 2012, at 16:10 , svn-commit-mai...@open-mpi.org wrote:
> Author: pasha (Pavel Sh
Eugene,
Can you please confirm that the issue is resolved on your setup ?
Pavel (Pasha) Shamis
---
Computer Science Research Group
Computer Science and Math Division
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
On Aug 29, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Shamis, Pavel wrote:
The issue #2 was fixed in r27178.
Paul - Th
The issue #2 was fixed in r27178.
Paul - Thanks for help !!!
Regards,
Pavel (Pasha) Shamis
---
Computer Science Research Group
Computer Science and Math Division
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
r27078 (ML collective component) broke some Solari
On Aug 29, 2012, at 3:46 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Anyway, looks like there is a problem with OMPI branches: this git repository
> seem to have all the relevant branches, but they are not updated. Both 1.6
> and 1.7 are branched from the same place, and their latest commit is from Aug
> 15
Hi Jeff,
On 8/22/2012 5:27 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Since no one objected to a) a git mirror, and b) hosting that git mirror on
> github, I've taken the liberty of making it live.
>
> http://www.open-mpi.org/svn/git.php
>
> Just like the Mercurial mirror, it pulls down changes from SVN at